The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 16 , ISSUE 3 ( March, 2015 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Evaluation of the Effect of using Electrosurgery in Pulpectomy of Deciduous Teeth on Succedaneous Teeth: An Animal Study

Hamid Jafarzadeh, Rasoul Sahebalam, Alireza Sarraf, Mojtaba Abdollahi, Hamidreza Rajati

Citation Information : Jafarzadeh H, Sahebalam R, Sarraf A, Abdollahi M, Rajati H. Evaluation of the Effect of using Electrosurgery in Pulpectomy of Deciduous Teeth on Succedaneous Teeth: An Animal Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015; 16 (3):183-186.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1658

Published Online: 01-03-2015

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2015; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study was to determine the probable side effects of electrosurgery in pulpectomy of deciduous teeth on succedaneous teeth in dogs.

Materials and methods

In this animal study, all maxillary and mandibular teeth at one side of five puppies’ mouths were treated employing electrosurgical pulpectomy and were then compared with those of the other side treated using the conventional method. The electrosurgical dental electrode was placed in canals to the point of working length for the experimental group. After pulpectomy, the canals were filled with zinc oxide eugenol paste and the access cavity was restored with amalgam. The dogs remained under care until their successor teeth erupted and clinical examination was performed.

Results

The teeth treated employing electrosurgical pulpectomy presented natural appearance with no observable defects including enamel hypoplasia, diffuse opacities of enamel, demarcated opacities, and enamel discoloration.

Conclusion

Electrosurgical pulpectomy can be considered as an option for pulpectomy of deciduous teeth.

How to cite this article

Sahebalam R, Sarraf A, Abdollahi M, Jafarzadeh H, Rajati H, Patil SG. Evaluation of the Effect of using Electrosurgery in Pulpectomy of Deciduous Teeth on Succedaneous Teeth: An Animal Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015;16(3):183-186.


PDF Share
  1. Pediatric dentistry, infancy through adolescence. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders Co, 2013.
  2. Pediatric dentistry: infancy through adolescence. St Louis: Elsevier, 2005.
  3. Root canal treatment of primary molars with infected pulps using calcium hydroxide as a root canal filling. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1995;19(4):255-258.
  4. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of pulpectomies using three root canal filling materials: an in-vivo study. J Ind Soc Ped Prev Dent 2010;28(1):25-29.
  5. Impact of Er, Cr:YSGG laser therapy on the cleanliness of the root canal walls of primary teeth. J Endod 2008;34(4):474-477.
  6. Cohen's pathways of the pulp. St Louis: Mosby Elsevier, 2011.
  7. Comparison between rotary and manual techniques on duration of instrumentation and obturation times in primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2011;35(4):359-363.
  8. Anatomical challenges, electronic working length determination and current developments in root canal preparation of primary molar teeth. Int Endod J 2013;46(11):1011-1022.
  9. Comparison between rotary and manual instrumentation in primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2008;32(4):295-298.
  10. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;105(4):e84-92.
  11. A retrospective study of endodontic treatment outcome between nickel-titanium rotary and stainless steel hand filing techniques. J Endod 2009;35(7):938-943.
  12. Rotary Mtwo system versus manual K-file instruments: efficacy in preparing primary and permanent molar root canals. Ind J Dent Res 2011;22(2):363-368.
  13. Comparison of conventional, rotary, and ultrasonic preparation, different final irrigation regimens, and 2 sealers in primary molar root canal therapy. Pediatr Dent 2006;28(6):518-523.
  14. Endodontics in primary molars using ultrasonic instrumentation. J Dent Child 2008;75(1):20-23.
  15. Electrosurgical pulpotomy—a 6-month study in primates. J Endod 1987;13(10):500-505.
  16. Histological evaluation of electrosurgery and formocresol pulpotomy techniques in primary teeth in dogs. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2001;26(1):81-85.
  17. Comparison of electrosurgical and formocresol pulpotomy procedures in children. Int J Pediatr Dent 2002;12(3):177-182.
  18. Clinical and radiographic comparison of primary molars after formocresol and electrosurgical pulpotomy: a randomized clinical trial. Ind J Dent Res 2008;19(3):219-223.
  19. Effect of root canal infection and treatment of traumatized primary incisors on their permanent successors. Dent Traumatol 1992;8(1):12-15.
  20. Predicting pulpectomy success and its relationship to exfoliation and succedaneous dentition. Pediatr Dent 1996;18(1):57-63.
  21. Ex vivo accuracy of an apex locator using digital signal processing in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 2009;31(4):320-322.
  22. The effect of electrosurgery on alveolar bone. J Periodontol 1983;54(2):96-100.
  23. Changes in developing succedaneous teeth as a consequence of infected deciduous molars. J Ind Soc Ped Prev Dent 2000;18(3):90-94.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.