The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 16 , ISSUE 3 ( March, 2015 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Mandibular Tori as Bone Grafts: An Alternative Treatment for Periodontal Osseous Defects — Clinical, Radiographic and Histologic Morphology Evaluation

Khalid S Hassan, Adel Al-Agal, Adel I Abdel-Hady, Wael M Swelam, Reda F Elgazzar

Citation Information : Hassan KS, Al-Agal A, Abdel-Hady AI, Swelam WM, Elgazzar RF. Mandibular Tori as Bone Grafts: An Alternative Treatment for Periodontal Osseous Defects — Clinical, Radiographic and Histologic Morphology Evaluation. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015; 16 (3):192-200.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1660

Published Online: 01-08-2015

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2015; The Author(s).


Abstract

Objectives

The present study was designed to evaluate the clinical, radiographic and histochemical significance of using the mandibular tori as autogenous bone graft for treatment of intraosseous defects in patients with chronic periodontitis.

Materials and methods

Twenty-eight sites from 14 patients with chronic periodontitis were included in this study. Each patient was treated with split mouth design; one site received torus mandibularis bone graft and the other site received a full-thickness flap alone. Histopathologic assessment was evaluated on removal of torus mandibularis to evaluate its histologic structure and by the end of the study 9 month later. Clinical and radiographic parameters were re-evaluated at 3 months interval for 1 year.

Results

The results of the present study revealed significant gain in the clinical attachment level (CAL) (88.4%, 4.53 ± 0.06 mm) for torus mandibularis sites compared to (39.7%, 2.01 ± 0.04 mm) for full-thickness flap. Moreover, there was a reduction in the probing pocket depth (PPD) of (75.4%, 5.75 ± 0.12 mm) for torus mandibularis sites and (49.6%, 3.73 ± 0.14 mm) for sites treated with a full-thickness flap only; CAL and PPD differences were significant at p-value .0.01. Concomitantly, significant radiographic increase in the bone height and density were recorded in the test group.

Conclusion

The use of mandibular tori as autogenous bone graft could provide benefits as a periodontal therapeutic modality and enhance regenerative potential of periodontal intraosseous defects.

How to cite this article

Hassan KS, Al-Agal A, Abdel-Hady AI, Swelam WM, Elgazzar RF. Mandibular Tori as Bone Grafts: An Alternative Treatment for Periodontal Osseous Defects — Clinical, Radiographic and Histologic Morphology Evaluation. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015;16(3):192-200.


PDF Share
  1. Assessment of guided tissue regeneration procedures in infrabony defects with bioabsorbable and non-resorbable barriers. J Periodont 1997;68(6):582-588.
  2. Persson guided tissue regeneration therapy of 203 consecutively treated intrabony defects using a bioabsorbable matrix barrier. Clinical and radiographic findings. J Periodont 1997;68(6):571-578.
  3. Clinical evaluation of bioactive glass in the treatment of periodontal osseous defects in humans. J Periodont 1998;69(9):1027-1033.
  4. Guided tissue regeneration with bioabsorbable barriers: Intrabony defects and class II furcations. J Periodont 2000;71(6):999-1008.
  5. Periodontal regeneration. A review of flap management. Periodont 2000 1993 Feb;1:100-108.
  6. Regenerative periodontal therapy. In:Lindhe J, Karring T, Lang NP, editors. Clinical Periodontology and Implant Dentistry. 3rd ed. Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1998. p. 597-646.
  7. Bone grafts and periodontal regeration. Periodont 2000 1993;1(1):80-91.
  8. Synthetic bone grafts in periodontics. Periodont 2000 1993;1(1):92-99.
  9. A clinical and histological evaluation of autogenous iliac bone grafts in humans: Part I. Wound healing 2 to 8 months. J Periodont 1973;44(10):599-613.
  10. The induction of new bone and cementum formation. IV. Microscopic examination of the periodontium following human bone and marrow allograft, autograft and nongraft periodontal regenerative procedures. J Periodont 1978;49(10):495-512.
  11. Healing responses of human intraosseous lesions following the use of debridement, grafting and citric acid root treatment. II. Clinical and histologic observations one year post surgery. J Periodont 1983;54(6): 325-328.
  12. Histologic evaluation of new attachment apparatus in humans. Part II. J Periodont 1989;60(12):676-682.
  13. Histologic evaluation of new attachment apparatus in humans. Part III. J Periodont 1989;60(12):683-693.
  14. Focus on intrabony defects: guided tissue regeneration. J Periodont 2000;22(1):104-132.
  15. New attachment of periodontal tissues after treatment of intrabony lesions. J Periodont 1971;42(10):648-652.
  16. Healing responses of human intraosseous lesions following the use of debridement, grafting and citric acid root treatment. I. Clinical and histologic observations six months postsurgery. J Periodont 1983;54(2):67-76.
  17. A histological examination of a free osseous autograft: case report. J Periodont 1975;46(5):289-293.
  18. Autogenous bone grafts: case report. Periodontics 1967;5(4):251-253.
  19. Intraoral transplants of cancellous bone and marrow in periodontal lesions. J Periodont 1973;44(4):194-208.
  20. Free osseous tissue autografts as a predictable procedure. J Periodont 1971;42(4):195-209.
  21. Oral and maxillofacial pathology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co 1995. p. 17-20.
  22. Concurrence of torus palatines with palatal and buccal exostoses: case report and review of the literure. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;85(5):552-557.
  23. Contemporary oral and maxillofacial pathology. St. Louis: Mosby 1997. p. 106-107.
  24. Oral pathology: clinical-pathologic correlations. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co 1989. p. 386-387.
  25. Toms mandibularis bei den Eskimos und anderen Rassen. Anat Anz 1908;32:295-306.
  26. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 1963 Dec 21;533.
  27. The periodontal disease index (PDI). J Periodont 1967;38(6):602-610.
  28. Autogenous particulate bone collected with a piezoelectric surgical device and bone trap: microbiological and histomorphometric study. Archives of Oral Biology 2006;51 (10):881-883.
  29. Von Kossa staining alone is not sufficient to confirm that mineralization in vitro represents bone formation. Calcified Tissue International 2003;72(5):537-547.
  30. A method to reduce interproximal overlapping and improve reproducibility of bitewing radiographs for use in clinical trials. Community Dent Oral Epidemol 1983;11(5):289-295.
  31. Digital image processing—an algorithmic approach using Java. Springer-Verlag New York. ISBN 2008; 978-1-84628-379-6.
  32. Periodontal regeneration of intrabony defects: an evidence-based treatment approach. Int J Periodont and Rest Dent 1995;15(2):128-145.
  33. Treatment of intrabony defects by different surgical procedures: a literature review. J Periodont 1998;69(3):303-310.
  34. Long-term results of guided tissue regeneration therapy with non-resorbable and bioabsorbable barriers. Class II furcations. J Periodont 2001;72(1):35-42.
  35. Osseous coagulum collected in bone traps: potential for bacterial contamination and methods for decontamination. J Oral Implantol 2007;33(3):109-115.
  36. Decontamination of autogenous bone grafts collected during dental implant site preparation: a pilot study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;107(5):656-660.
  37. Periodontal healing following reconstructive surgery: effect of guided tissue regeneration using a bioresorbable barrier device when combined with autogenous bone grafting. A randomized controlled trial 10-year follow-up. J Clin Periodontol 2010;37(4):366-373.
  38. Healing of two and three wall intrabony periodontal defects following treatment with an enamel matrix derivative combined with autogenous bone. J Clin Periodontol 2010;37(6):544-550.
  39. Mandibular tori as a source for onlay bone graft augmentation: a surgical procedure. The Implant Report 1997;9(9):973-984.
  40. The intraoral bone harvesting sites for osseous reconstruction in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Oral Health 2003;93(5): 10-24.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.