The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 16 , ISSUE 4 ( April, 2015 ) > List of Articles


Advances in Soft Denture Liners: An Update

Farouk Ahmed Hussein

Citation Information : Hussein FA. Advances in Soft Denture Liners: An Update. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015; 16 (4):314-318.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1682

Published Online: 01-09-2015

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2015; The Author(s).


How to cite this article

Hashem MI. Advances in Soft Denture Liners: An Update. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015;16(4):314-318.

PDF Share
  1. Adhesive bond strength and compliance for denture soft lining materials. Biomaterials 2002;23(5):1347-1352.
  2. Dynamic viscoelasticity of soft liners and masticatory function. J Dent Res 2002;81(2):123-128.
  3. Physical property comparison of 11 soft denture lining materials as a function of accelerated aging. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69(1):114-119.
  4. The influence of relining or implant retaining existing mandibular dentures on health-related quality of life: a 2-year randomized study of dissatisfied edentulous patients. Int J Prosthodont 2013;26(1):68-78.
  5. Color stability of silicone or acrylic denture liners: an in vitro investigation. Eur J Dent 2007;1(3):144-151.
  6. Resiliency of surfacesealed temporary soft denture liners. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77(4):370-374.
  7. Soft lining materials: composition and structure. J Oral Rehabil 1976;3(3):273-278.
  8. Development of a nondestructive compliance test for resilient denture liners. J Prosthodont 2001;10(2):91-96.
  9. Variation in the response to mechanical stress of human soft tissues as related to age. J Prosthet Dent 1974;32(5):493-500.
  10. Soft liners. Dent Clin North Am 2004;48(3):709-720.
  11. Water absorption of methacrylate soft lining materials. Biomaterials 1989;10(2):91-95.
  12. Prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients. Complete dentures and implant-supported prostheses. 12th. ed. St. Louis: Mosby 2004.
  13. Tissue conditioners as functional impression materials. J Oral Rehabil 1978;5(4):357-364.
  14. The compatibility of temporary soft materials with immersion denture cleansers. Int J Prosthodont 1989;2(3):254-258.
  15. Comparison of bond strength of six soft denture liners to denture base resin. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68(2):368-371.
  16. Bond strength of a silicone lining material to alumina-abraded and lased denture resin. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2004;71(1):196-200.
  17. Evaluation of bond strength of soft relining materials to denture base polymers. Dent Mater 2007;23(11):1373-1381.
  18. Effect of net fiber reinforcement surface treatment on soft denture liner retention and longevity. J Prosthodont 2010;19(4):258-262.
  19. Effect of oxygen plasma treatment on the bonding of a soft liner to an acrylic resin denture material. Dent Mater J 2010;29(4):398-402.
  20. Colonization and penetration of denture soft lining materials by Candida albicans. Dent Mater 2004;20(2):167-175.
  21. In vivo fungal presence and growth on two resilient denture liners. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65(4):528-532.
  22. The prevention of the growth of Candida on silastic 390 soft liner for dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1975;33(3):250-257.
  23. In vitro antimicrobial effect of the tissue conditioner containing silver nanoparticles. J Adv Prosthodont 2011;3(1):20-24.
  24. Inhibitory effect of antibacterial resin composite against Streptococcus mutans. Caries Res 1999;33(5):366-371.
  25. Development of an antimicrobial resin: a pilot study. Dent Mater 2011;27(4):322-328.
  26. Developing the procedure of modifying the denture soft liner by silver nanoparticles. Acta Bioeng Biomech 2012;14(1):23-29.
  27. Effect of antifungal gels incorporated into a tissue conditioning material on the growth of Candida albicans. Gerodontology 2010;27(4):292-296.
  28. The effectiveness, in vitro, of miconazole and ketoconazole combined with tissue conditioners in inhibiting the growth of Candida albicans. J Oral Rehabil 1985;12(2):177-182.
  29. Evaluation of adhesive properties of three resilient denture liners by the modified peel test method. Acta Biomater 2009;5(2):764-769.
  30. The effect of two different coatings on the surface integrity and softness of a tissue conditioner. J Prosth Dent 2002;87(2):153-157.
  31. Influence of varnish application on a tissue conditioner: analysis of biofilm adhesion. Gerodontol 2010;27(3):207-210.
  32. In vitro evaluation of cytotoxicity of soft lining materials on L929 cells by MTT assay. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009;90(1):82-86.
  33. The effect of brushing on surface roughness of denture lining materials. J Prosthod 2007;16(3):179-184.
  34. Effect of polishing technique and brushing on surface roughness of acrylic resins. J Prosthodont 2008;17(4):308-311.
  35. Surface changes in denture soft liners with and without sealer coating following abrasion with mechanical brushing. Gerodontol 2011;28(2):146-151.
  36. In vitro changes in hardness of sealed resilient lining materials on immersion in various fluids. J Prosthod 2008;17(5):384-391.
  37. Color stability of denture acrylic resins and a soft lining material against tea, coffee and nicotine. J Prosth 2010;19(2):118-124.
  38. Evaluation of colour and hardness changes of soft lining materials in food colorant solutions. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26(10):821-829.
  39. Water absorption of (RTV) silicone denture soft lining material. J Dent 1996;24(1-2):105-108.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.