Citation Information :
El-Hussein IG. Effect of Different Definitive Impression Techniques for Resorbed Mandibular Ridge on Retention of a Lower Complete Denture. J Contemp Dent Pract 2023; 24 (8):509-514.
Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of different definitive impression techniques for the resorbed mandibular ridge on the retention of lower complete dentures.
Materials and methods: Ten completely edentulous male patients with severe atrophic mandibular ridge were selected from the Prosthodontic Department's outpatient clinic, Faculty of Dentistry, Sinai University (Kantara branch). Each patient received four dentures. Dentures were divided into four groups according to the type of final impression, Group I: Conventional impression techniques (open mouth technique), Group II: Cocktail impression techniques, Group III: Modified functional impression technique, and Group IV: Wire impression technique. Each denture was used for one month and at the end of the month the retention test was carried out and the results were tabulated and statistically analyzed.
Results: There is a statistically significant difference between the groups. The results also showed that the highest mean value was in group IV, whereas the lowest mean value of retention was in group I.
Conclusion: Wire impressions produce lower dentures with higher retention, whereas conventional impressions produce lower dentures with the lowest retention, so it is considered to be more advantageous.
Clinical significance: The wire impression technique is superior in the management of resorbed ridges as compared with other techniques.
Kumar L. Biomechanics and clinical implications of complete edentulous state. Journal of Clinical Gerontology and Geriatrics 2014;5(4):101–104. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcgg.2014.03.001.
Emami E, de Souza RF, Kabawat M, et al. The impact of edentulism on oral and general health. Int J Dent 2013;2013:498305. DOI: 10.1155/2013/498305.
Karnam S, Basimi S, Surapaneni H, et al. Severely resorbed edentulous ridges: A preventive prosthodontic approach – A case report. J Clin Diagn Res 2015;9(10):ZD17–ZD19. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/15439.6666.
Lin HK, Pan YH, Salamanca E, et al. Prevention of bone resorption by ha/β-tcp + collagen composite after tooth extraction: A case series. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019;16(23):4616. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16234616.
Sikri A, Sikri J. “Residual ridge resorption: An affliction for the prosthodontist”. SVOA Dentistry 2022;3(2):68–69. Available from: https://sciencevolks.com/dentistry/pdf/SVOA-DE-03-077.pdf.
Raj KS, Suganya S, Malode G. Prosthodontic rehabilitation of compromised upper and lower residual alveolar ridges: A case report. IP Ann Prosthodont Restor Dent 2021;7(2):91–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18231/j.aprd.2021.019.
Fanshawe TR, Vazquez-Montes M. How to reduce diagnostic error: ‘Neutral zone’ approach. BMJ Evid Based Med 2021;26(2):71–72. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2019-111324.
Gupta R, Luthra RP, Gupta S. A comparative analysis of retention of mandibular denture bases in patients with resorbed ridges with or without sublingual extension – An vivo study. Int J of Adv Res 2016;4(11):1920–1929. DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/2294.
Jassim TK, Kareem AE, Alloaibi MA. In vivo evaluation of the impact of various border molding materials and techniques on the retention of complete maxillary dentures. Dent Med Probl 2020;57(2):191–196. DOI: 10.17219/dmp/115104.
Chandra D, Chairunnisa R, Nasution ID. Modification closed mouth functional impression technique for flabby and flat ridge: A case report. Indonesian Journal of Prosthodontics 2021;2(2):41–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46934/ijp.v2i2.39.
Rameez M, Razi SS, Farhan F, et al. Clinical implications of elastomeric impression materials used for complete denture construction. Dent Med Res 2018;6(1):19–23. DOI:10.4103/dmr.dmr_10_17.
Alammari MR. Evaluation of the functional impression technique with various impression materials on the surface topography of dental stone casts and their effect on retention. Open Journal of Stomatology 2018;8(7):258–270. DOI: 10.4236/ojst.2018.87024.
Praveen G, Gupta S, Agarwal S, et al. Cocktail impression technique: A new approach to Atwood's order vi mandibular ridge deformity. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2011;11(1):32–35. DOI: 10.1007/s13191-011-0055-z.
Sharma A, Kumar M, Khosla A, et al. Zone of minimal conflict recorded using modified technique: A case report. Dental Journal of Advance Studies 2016;04(03):213–217. DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1672073.
Daniel S, Daniel AY, Kurian N. A modified physiologic impression technique for atrophic mandibular ridges. CHRISMED J Health Res 2017;4(3):204–208. DOI: 10.4103/cjhr.cjhr_11_17.
Yadav B, Jayna M, Yadav H, et al. Comparison of different final impression techniques for management of resorbed mandibular ridge: A case report. Case Reports in Dentistry 2014; Article ID 253731:1–6. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/253731.
Singh N, Kaur G, Kaur K. Comparison of two impression techniques for secondary impression for complete denture. J Adv Med Dent Scie Res 2018;6(9):125–127. DOI: 10.21276/jamdsr.
Jankar AS, Gatkal V, Kamble S, et al. Prosthodontic management of compromised mandibular ridge using modified functional impression technique combined with neutral zone concept - A case report. Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS) 2016;15(6):55–59. DOI: 10.9790/0853-1506095559.
Tanvir H, Kumar N, Singh K, et al. An innovative wire impression technique of highly resorbed mandibular ridge. Periodon Prosthodon 2017;3:1. DOI: 10.21767/2471-3082.100030.
Godlin Jeneta J, Subhashree R, Nivedhitha MS. Association of residual ridge resorption with age, gender and underlying medical conditions in completely edentulous patients - A retrospective study. Int J Dentistry Oral Sci 2021;8(8):3849–3855. DOI: 10.19070/2377-8075-21000788.
Rastogi I. Management of highly resorbed mandibular ridge review article. Int J Dent Health Sci 2014;1(4):512–522.
Jain M. Impression techniques for the resorbed mandibular arch: A guide to increased stability. J Sci Soc 2015;42(2):88–91. DOI: 10.4103/0974-5009.157037.
Vellingiri SK, Shivakumar S, Lahiri B, et al. In vitro assessment of the wettability of three commercially available saliva substitutes on denture base material: A comparative study. World J Dent 2022;13(4):389–393. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-2057.
Eldahmy LS, Sabet ME, Rizk FN, et al. The effect of different scanning protocols on the retention of digitally constructed complete denture bases. Int J Dent & Ora Hea 2021;7(2):46–54.
CJ Drago. “A retrospective comparison of two definitive impression techniques and their associated post insertion adjustments in complete denture prosthodontics,” Journal of Prosthodontics 2003;12(3):192–197. DOI: 10.1016/S1059-941X(03)00082-2.
Bajaj S, Anusha G, Prakash D. Comparison of different final impression techniques and occlusal schemes for management of resorbed mandibular ridge: A case report. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) 2017;6(9):1506–1511. Corpus ID: 42591125.
Abdel-Hakim AM, Al-Dalgan SA, Al-Bishre GM. Displacement of border tissues during final impression procedures. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71(2):133–138. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(94)90020-5.
Gupta A, Singhal P, Negi P. “Selective pressure impression technique: An overview”. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences 2014;3(29):8110–8114. DOI: 10.14260/jemds/2014/3020.
Dadarwal A, Paliwal J, Sharma V, et al. Microstrain analysis of selective pressure techniques for mandibular complete denture impression: An in vivo study. Cureus 2022;14(3):e23673. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.23673.
Hyde TP, Craddock HL, Blance A, et al. A cross-over randomised controlled trial of selective pressure impressions for lower complete dentures. J Dent 2010;38(11):853–858. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.07.003.
Shah U, Mahajan N, Bhatt N. Clinical evaluation of complete denture fabricated using two different final impression techniques on masticatory efficiency and oral health-related quality of life. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2022;22(4):382–388. DOI: 10.4103/jips.jips_39_22.