The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Volume  25 (2024)
Volume  24 (2023)
Volume  23 (2022)
Volume  22 (2021)
Volume  21 (2020)
Volume  20 (2019)
Volume  19 (2018)
Volume  18 (2017)
Volume  17 (2016)
Volume  16 (2015)
Volume  15 (2014)
Volume  14 (2013)
Volume  13 (2012)
Volume  12 (2011)
Volume  11 (2010)
Volume  10 (2009)
Volume  9 (2008)
Volume  8 (2007)
Volume  7 (2006)
Volume  6 (2005)
Volume  5 (2004)
Volume  4 (2003)
Volume  3 (2002)
Volume  2 (2001)
Volume  1 (1999)
Related articles

VOLUME 16 , ISSUE 5 ( May, 2015 ) > List of Articles

REVIEW ARTICLE

Resilon: Review of a New Material for Obturation of the Canal

Hamid Jafarzadeh, Zahed Mohammadi, Sousan Shalavi, Jun-Ichiro Kinoshita

Citation Information : Jafarzadeh H, Mohammadi Z, Shalavi S, Kinoshita J. Resilon: Review of a New Material for Obturation of the Canal. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015; 16 (5):407-414.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1698

Published Online: 01-11-2015

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2015; The Author(s).


Abstract

How to cite this article

Mohammadi Z, Jafarzadeh H, Shalavi S, Bhandi S, Kinoshita J-I. Resilon: Review of a New Material for Obturation of the Canal. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015;16(5): 407-414.

PDF Share
  1. Endodontic materials. Dent Clin North Am 2007;51(3):695-712.
  2. Resilon™: A novel material to replace gutta-percha. Oral Health 2004.
  3. An evaluation of microbial leakage in roots filled with a thermoplastic synthetic polymer-based root canal filling material (Resilon). J Endod 2004;30(5):342-347.
  4. Ultrastructural evaluation of the apical seal in roots filled with a polycaprolactone-based root canal filling material. J Endod 2005;31(7):514-519.
  5. J Endod 2006;32(4):324-327.
  6. Comparative analysis of microleakage and seal for 2 obturation materials: Resilon/Epiphany and gutta-percha. J Can Dent Assoc 2006;72(3):245.
  7. A fluid filtration comparison of gutta-percha versus Resilon, a new soft resin endodontic obturation system. J Endod 2006;32(7):642-645.
  8. An in vitro assessment of the sealing ability of Resilon/epiphany using fluid filtration. J Endod 2006;32(8):759-761.
  9. Evaluation of dye penetration test versus bacterial microleakage test to determine sealing ability of root canal filling materials. SADJ 2007;62(7):306-308.
  10. The apical sealing ability of a new root canal filling material. Am J Dent 2007;20(5):295-298.
  11. An in vitro evaluation of the apical sealing ability of a new resin-based root canal obturation system. J Endod 2006;32(10):976-978.
  12. Glucose reactivity with filling materials as a limitation for using the glucose leakage model. Int Endod J 2008;41(10):869-872.
  13. Enterococcus faecalis type strain leakage through root canals filled with Gutta- Percha/AH plus or Resilon/Epiphany. J Endod 2007;33(1):45-47.
  14. An evaluation of the sealing ability of MTA and Resilon: a bacterial leakage study. Iran Endod J 2007;2(2):43-46.
  15. Microbial leakage of gutta-percha and Resilon root canal filling material: a comparative study using a new homogeneous assay for sequence detection. J Biomater Appl 2008;22(4):337-352.
  16. Negative influence of continuous wave technique on apical sealing of the root canal system with Resilon. J Oral Sci 2007;49(2):121-128.
  17. Apical sealing ability of Resilon/Epiphany versus gutta-percha/AH Plus: immediate and 16-months leakage. Int Endod J 2007;40(9):722-729.
  18. Reduced long-term sealing ability of adhesive root fillings after water-storage stress. J Endod 2008;34(3):322-325.
  19. Coronal sealing ability of a new root canal filling material. J Can Dent Assoc 2007;73(7):623.
  20. Evaluation of the quality of the apical seal in Resilon/ Epiphany and gutta-percha/AH Plus-filled root canals by using a fluid filtration approach. J Endod 2007;33(8):944-947.
  21. Evaluation of the sealing ability of gutta-percha and thermoplastic synthetic polymer-based systems along the root canals through the glucose penetration model. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;104(6):e66-73.
  22. An in vitro comparison of microleakage between Resilon and gutta-percha with a fluid filtration model. J Endod 2007;33(12):1447-1449.
  23. Significance of moist root canal dentin with the use of methacrylate-based endodontic sealers: an in vitro coronal dye leakage study. J Endod 2008;34(1):76-79.
  24. Comparison of regrowth of Enterococcus faecalis in dentinal tubules after sealing with gutta-percha or Resilon. J Endod 2008;34(4):445-448.
  25. In vitro comparison of coronal microleakage between Resilon alone and gutta-percha with a glass-ionomer intraorifice barrier using a fluid filtration model. J Endod 2008;34(6):718-720.
  26. Comparative assessment of ActiV GP/glass ionomer sealer, Resilon/Epiphany, and gutta-percha/AH plus obturation: a bacterial leakage study. J Endod 2008;34(6):725-727.
  27. Regional push-out bond strength and coronal microleakage of Resilon after different light-curing methods. J Endod 2007;33(12):1464-1468.
  28. Coronal and apical leakage analysis of two different root canal obturation systems. Braz Oral Res 2008;22(3):211-215.
  29. Apical leakage of epiphany root canal sealer combined with different master cones. Eur J Dent 2008;2(2):91-95.
  30. Resin-based versus gutta-percha-based root canal obturation: influence on bacterial leakage in an in vitro model system. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;108(2):292-296.
  31. Long-term evaluation of the sealing ability of two root canal sealers in combination with self-etching bonding agents. J Adhes Dent 2009;11(3):239-246.
  32. Comparative analysis of leakage in root canal fillings performed with gutta-percha and Resilon cones with AH Plus and Epiphany sealers. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;109(2):e131-135.
  33. Effect of chlorhexidine on coronal microleakage from root canals obturated with Resilon/Epiphany Self-Etch. J Oral Sci 2010;52(1):83-87.
  34. Microleakage of various root filling systems by glucose filtration analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;109(6):e96-102.
  35. Ex vivo evaluation of coronal and apical microbial leakage of root canal╌filled with gutta-percha or Resilon/Epiphany root canal filling material. Indian J Dent Res 2010;21(1):98-103.
  36. Long-term sealing ability of resin-based root canal fillings. Int Endod J 2010;43(6):455-460.
  37. Active versus passive microleakage of Resilon/Epiphany and gutta-percha/AH Plus. Aust Endod J 2011;37(3):141-146.
  38. The effect of irrigation solutions on the apical sealing ability in different root canal sealers. Braz Oral Res 2010;24(2):165-169.
  39. Comparison of the single cone and cold lateral compaction techniques in sealing 0.04 taper root canal preparations. Gen Dent 2010;58(5):e219-222.
  40. The comparison of microbial leakage in roots filled with resilon and gutta-percha: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2011;14(1):21-27.
  41. An in vitro assessment of apical microleakage in root canals obturated with guttaflow, Resilon, thermafil and lateral condensation: A stereomicroscopic study. J Conserv Dent 2011;14(2):173-177.
  42. Microleakage of root canal fillings with GuttaFlow and Resilon compared with lateral condensation. Wien Med Wochenschr 2010;160(9-10):230-234.
  43. Bacterial leakage of GuttaFlow-filled root canals compared with Resilon/Epiphany and Gutta-percha/AH26- filled root canals. Aust Endod J 2012;38(1):10-13.
  44. Effect of intracanal medicament on the sealing ability of root canals filled with Resilon. J Endod 2006;32(6):532-536.
  45. Microbial leakage of Gutta-Percha and Resilon root canal filling material: a comparative study using a new homogeneous assay for sequence detection. J Biomater Appl 2008;22(4):337-352.
  46. Fracture resistance of roots endodontically treated with a new resin filling material. J Am Dent Assoc 2004;135(5):646-652.
  47. Reinforcement of immature roots with a new resin filling material. J Endod 2006;32(4):350-353.
  48. Resistance to fracture of roots filled with three different techniques. Int Endod J 2007;40(1):31-35.
  49. Fracture resistance of simulated immature teeth filled with resilon, gutta-percha, or composite. J Endod 2007;33(4):480-483.
  50. Effect of new obturating materials on vertical root fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Endod 2007;33(6):732-736.
  51. Effect of different root canal sealers on fracture strength of simulated immature roots. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011;112(4):544-547.
  52. Influence of different root canal-filling materials on the mechanical properties of root canal dentin. J Endod 2007;33(7):859-863.
  53. Influence of different endodontic filling materials on root fracture susceptibility. J Dent 2008;36(1):69-73.
  54. Evaluation of fracture resistance in simulated immature teeth using Resilon and Ribbond as root reinforcements—an in vitro study. Dent Traumatol 2009;25(4):433-438.
  55. An in vitro comparative evaluation of depth of tubular penetration of three resin-based root canal sealers. J Conserv Dent 2012;15(1):18-21.
  56. Effects of new adhesive resin root canal filling materials on vertical root fractures. Aust Endod J 2010;36(1):19-23.
  57. Fracture resistance of teeth obturated with gutta percha and Resilon: an in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2010;13(2):61-64.
  58. In vitro resistance to fracture of roots obturated with Resilon or gutta-percha. J Endod 2011;37(6):828-831.
  59. Efficacy of retreatment techniques for a resin-based root canal obturation material. J Endod 2006;32(4):341-344.
  60. Comparison between gutta-percha and Resilon removal using two different techniques in endodontic retreatment. J Endod 2006;32(4):362-364.
  61. Retreatment efficacy of the Epiphany soft resin obturation system. Int Endod J 2007;40(8):633-643.
  62. In vitro evaluation of the cleansing working time and analysis of the amount of gutta-percha or Resilon remnants in the root canal walls after instrumentation for endodontic retreatment. J Endod 2007;33(12):1426-1428.
  63. Comparative study of removal of current endodontic fillings. J Endod 2008;34(3):326-329.
  64. Removal of resinbased root canal filling materials with K3 rotary instruments: relative efficacy for different combinations of filling materials. Dent Mater J 2008;27(1):75-80.
  65. The effectiveness of manual and mechanical instrumentation for the retreatment of three different root canal filling materials. J Endod 2008;34(4):466-469.
  66. The comparison of gutta-percha and Resilon penetration into lateral canals with different thermoplastic delivery systems. J Endod 2008;34(7):847-849.
  67. Efficacy of 3 techniques in removing root canal filling material. J Can Dent Assoc 2008;74(8):p721.
  68. Comparison between gutta-percha and Resilon retreatment. J Oral Sci 2009;51(2):181-185.
  69. The efficacy of R-Endo rotary NiTi and stainless-steel hand instruments to remove guttapercha and Resilon. Int Endod J 2010;43(2):135-141.
  70. Solvent capacity of different substances on gutta-percha and Resilon. Braz Dent J 2010;21(1):46-49.
  71. Efficacy of three different rotary files to remove gutta-percha and Resilon from root canals. Int Endod J 2010;43(11):1022-1028.
  72. Effectiveness of three solvents and two associations of solvents on gutta-percha and Resilon. Braz Dent J 2011;22(1):41-44.
  73. A comparison of the effectiveness of chloroform in dissolving Resilon and guttapercha. J Dent (Tehran) 2011;8(1):19-24.
  74. Short-term cytotoxicity assessment of components of the epiphany resin-percha obturating system by indirect and direct contact millipore filter assays. J Endod 2007;33(1):24-27.
  75. In vivo evaluation of the biocompatibility of a new resin-based obturation system. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;104(3):e60-66.
  76. The response of subcutaneous connective tissue to a new endodontic filling material. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008;84(2):463-467.
  77. J Endod 2007;33(11):1299-1303.
  78. Cytotoxicity evaluation of Activ GP and Resilon sealers in vitro. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;107(6):e74-78.
  79. Comparative study of the cytotoxic effect of Resilon against two cell lines. Braz Dent J 2008;19(4):291-295.
  80. Biocompatibility evaluation of Epiphany/ Resilon root canal filling system in subcutaneous tissue of rats. J Endod 2010;36(1):110-114.
  81. The antimicrobial and antifungal activity of a root canal core material. J Am Dent Assoc 2007;138(9):1228-1232.
  82. Residual effects and surface alterations in disinfected gutta-percha and Resilon cones. J Endod 2007;33(8):948-951.
  83. Influence of endodontic irrigants on resin sealer bond strength to radicular dentin. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll 2012;53(1):1-7.
  84. A comparative study of physicochemical properties of AH Plus, Epiphany, and Epiphany SE root canal sealers. Int Endod J 2009;42(9):785-793.
  85. Shear bond strength of AH-26 and Epiphany to composite resin and Resilon. J Endod 2008;34(11):1385-1387.
  86. Interfacial st rength of Resilon and g utta-percha to intraradicular dentin. J Endod 2005;31(11):809-813.
  87. An in vitro comparison of the intraradicular dentin bond strength of Resilon and gutta-percha. J Endod 2006;32(10):963-966.
  88. New endodontic obturation systems and their interfacial bond strength with intraradicular dentine - ex vivo studies. Adv Med Sci 2011;56(2):327-333.
  89. An in vitro comparison of bond strength of various obturation materials to root canal dentin using a push-out test design. J Endod 2007;33(7):856-858.
  90. Push-out bond strength of a new endodontic obturation system (Resilon/ Epiphany). J Endod 2007;33(2):160-162.
  91. Micropush-out bond strengths of gutta-percha versus thermoplastic synthetic polymer-based s ystems—an e x v ivo s tudy. I nt E ndod J 2008;41(3):211-218.
  92. Push-out bond strengths: the Epiphany-Resilon endodontic obturation system compared with different pairings of Epiphany, Resilon, AH Plus and gutta-percha. Int Endod J 2006;39(8):643-647.
  93. Bond strength of Resilon/Epiphany compared with Gutta-percha and sealers Sealer 26 and Endo Fill. Aust Endod J 2012;38(1):21-25.
  94. Effect of various endodontic solutions on punch out strength of Resilon under cyclic loading. J Conserv Dent 2011;14(4):366-369.
  95. Pushout bond strength of Resilon/Epiphany self-etch and guttapercha/ AH26 after different irrigation protocols. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;110(5):e88-92.
  96. Soft chelating irrigation protocol optimizes bonding quality of Resilon/ Epiphany root fillings. J Endod 2008;34(6):703-705.
  97. Push-out bond strength of Resilon/Epiphany self-etch to intraradicular dentin after retreatment: a preliminary study. J Endod 2010;36(3):493-496.
  98. Comparison of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite, MTAD, and 2% chlorhexidine in the rapid disinfection of polycaprolactone-based root canal filling material. J Endod 2007;33(1):42-44.
  99. Disinfection of artificially contaminated Resilon cones with chlorhexidine and sodium hypochlorite at different time exposures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;103(3):e82-85.
  100. Efficacy of different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine in disinfection of contaminated Resilon cones. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2012;17(2):e352-355.
  101. Influence of immediate and delayed post space preparation on sealing ability of resilon. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;103(6):e61-64.
  102. Comparison of coronal bacterial leakage between immediate versus delayed post-space preparation in root canals filled with Resilon/Epiphany. Int Endod J 2009;42(3):203-207.
  103. Sealing properties of one-step root-filling fibre postobturators vs two-step delayed fibre post-placement. J Dent 2010;38(7):547-552.
  104. A laboratory comparison of apical leakage between immediate versus delayed post space preparation in root canals filled with Resilon. Int Endod J 2010;43(9): 775-781.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.