The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 16 , ISSUE 12 ( December, 2015 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Evaluating Transportation by Comparing Several uses of Rotary Endodontic Files

Ranya F Elemam, JA Capelas, Mário AP Vaz, Nuno Viriato, ML Pereira, A Azevedo, John West

Citation Information : Elemam RF, Capelas J, Vaz MA, Viriato N, Pereira M, Azevedo A, West J. Evaluating Transportation by Comparing Several uses of Rotary Endodontic Files. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015; 16 (12):927-932.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1783

Published Online: 01-12-2015

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2015; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

To evaluate the frequent use of ProTaper Next (PTN; Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) systems on shaping ability of root canal utilizing Solidworks (2014, Dassault Systèmes) software.

Materials and methods

Thirty-six root canals in clear resin blocks (Dentsply-Maillefer) were allocated into six experimental groups (n = 36). Six new sets of PTN instruments (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) were used six times to shape the resin blocks. A #15 K-file was inserted to the working length (WL), followed by ProGlider (PG) to create a glide path. Sequential use of PTN instrumentation in a crown-down technique was used to reach size (30/07) apically. Macroscopic photos of the blocks were taken before and after instrumentation, layered by Paint Shop Pro 9 from JascSoftware®, and then canal transportation was measured using Solidwork 2014. The data were analyzed by SPSS software version 22. Multivariate statistical analysis general linear model (GLM) was also applied. Bonferroni correction test was used in multiple comparisons and the statistical significance was set to 0.05.

Results

There was no difference in canal transportation resulted from utilizing PTN files after six multiple uses; in addition, the PTN files showed ability to maintain the original canal anatomy, especially in the apical level, where lowest total mean value of canal center displacement was seen (3 mm level) (0.019 ± 0.017).

Conclusion

ProTaper Next files can be used to prepare single and multiple canals in a single furcated tooth.

Clinical significance

ProTaper Next nickel-titanium (NiTi) file system is a safe instrument that respects the canal shape, allows practitioners to treat difficult cases with good results, and low risk of separation.

How to cite this article

Elemam RF, Capelas JA, Vaz MAP, Viriato N, Pereira ML, Azevedo A, West J. Evaluating Transportation by Comparing Several uses of Rotary Endodontic Files. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015;16(12):927-932.


PDF Share
  1. Root canal centering ability of rotary cutting nickel-titanium instruments: a meta-analysis. J Conserv Dent 2014;17(6):504-509.
  2. A comparative study of root canal preparation using ProFile, 04 and Lightspeed rotary NiTi instruments. Int Endod J 2002;35(1):37-46.
  3. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North Am 1974;18(2):269-296.
  4. The effect of preparation procedures on original canal shape and on apical foramen shape. J Endod 1975;1:262-266.
  5. Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review. J Endod 2004;30(8):559-567.
  6. 7th ed. Chicago: AAE; 2003.
  7. Shaping ability of three ProFile rotary instrumentation techniques in simulated resin root canals. J Endod 2000;26(12):719-723.
  8. Wizard CD Plus and ProTaper Universal: analysis of apical transportation using new software. J Applied Oral Sci 2013;21(5):468-474.
  9. Canal-centering ability of two rotary file systems. J Endod 2002;28(4):283-286.
  10. The validity of using simulated root canals as models for ultrasonic instrumentation. J Endod 1989;15(11):544-547.
  11. Numeric comparison of the static mechanical behavior between profile GT and profile GT series X rotary nickel-titanium files. J Endod 2011;37(8):1158-1161.
  12. Influence of crosssectional design and dimension on mechanical behavior of nickel-titanium instruments under torsion and bending: a numerical analysis. J Endod 2010;36(8):1394-1398.
  13. Mechanical behavior of three nickeltitanium rotary files: a comparison of numerical simulation with bending and torsion tests. Materials Science and Engineering: C 2014;37(1):258-263.
  14. The effect of instrument material, taper and degree of root canal curvature on cyclic fatigue of rotary nickel-titanium instruments. Endodontic Practice Today 2013;7(1):59-64.
  15. How accurate replicates the Thermafil System the morphology of the apical endodontic space? An ex vivo study. Rom J Morphol Embryol 2011;52(1):145-151.
  16. Shaping ability of ProTaper Next and BT-RaCe nickel-titanium instruments in severely curved root canals. Int Endod J 2015;48(8):774-781.
  17. Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals. J Endod 2014;40(6):852-856.
  18. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of ProTaper Next, iRaCe and Hyflex CM rotary NiTi files in severely curved root canals. Int Endod J 2015;48(2):131-136.
  19. Evaluation of root canal transportation, centering ratio, and remaining dentin thickness associated with ProTaper Next instruments with and without glide path. J Endod 2014;40(12):2053-2056.
  20. Critical evaluation of root canal transportation by instrumentation. Endod Topics 2013;29(1):110-124.
  21. An analysis of canal centering using mechanical instrumentation techniques. J Endod 1999;25(6):441-445.
  22. Geometric analysis of root canals prepared by four rotary NiTi shaping systems. J Endod 2012;38(7):996-1000.
  23. Apical extrusion of debris using ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next rotary systems. Int Endod J 2015;48(3):283-286.
  24. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of the preparation of mesiobuccal root canals in maxillary first molars with Hyflex CM, Twisted Files, and K3 instruments. J Endod 2013;39(3):385-388.
  25. Canal shaping with WaveOne Primary reciprocating files and ProTaper system: a comparative study. J Endod 2012;38(4):505-509.
  26. Effect of repeated use on the shaping ability of ProTaper Universal rotary files. Int Dent SA 2010;12:30-35.
  27. Leakage along apical root fillings in curved root canals. Part I: effects of apical transportation on seal of root fillings. J Endod 2000;26(4):210-216.
  28. Shaping ability of ProFile and K3 rotary NiTi instruments when used in a variable tip sequence in simulated curved root canals. Int Endod J 2004;37(9):593-601.
  29. Evaluation of single-use rotary nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod 2003;29(10):664-666.
  30. A retrospective clinical study of incidence of root canal instrument separation in an endodontics graduate program: a PennEndo database study. J Endod 2006;32(11):1048-1052.
  31. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile— Part 1: shaping ability in simulated curved canals. Int Endod J 2003;36(3):199-207.
  32. The effect of operational speed on the fracture of nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 2007;33(1):52-54.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.