The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 17 , ISSUE 11 ( November, 2016 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Intended and Achieved Torque of Implant Abutment's Screw using Manual Wrenches in Simulated Clinical Setting

Hanan N Al-Otaibi

Citation Information : Al-Otaibi HN. Intended and Achieved Torque of Implant Abutment's Screw using Manual Wrenches in Simulated Clinical Setting. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016; 17 (11):897-901.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1950

Published Online: 01-11-2016

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2016; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Objective

To measure the difference between the intended torque and the achieved torque by the operator using the springstyle mechanical torque-limiting device (MTLD).

Materials and methods

Inexperienced and experienced clinicians used one spring-type MTLD to torque two abutment screws of each anterior and posterior implants, which were attached to two digital torque meters through a jaw model. The jaw model was part of a preclinical bench manikin attached to a dental chair. The intended torque value was 35 N cm (recommended by manufacturer) and the technique of torquing was observed for all the participants (instantaneous and repeated). The mean torque value was calculated for each subject for the anterior and posterior implants independently; t-test was used to compare between the intended and achieved torque values and to compare between the experienced and inexperienced clinicians (p ≤0.05).

Results

Thirty-seven clinicians participated, with an overall mean torque value of 34.30 N cm. The mean torque value of the achieved torque (34.30 ± 4.13 N cm) was statistically significantly less than the intended torque (p = 0.041). The male clinicians produced more statistically significantly accurate torque value (34.54 ± 3.78 N cm) than the female clinicians (p = 0.034), and the experienced clinicians produced more accurate torque values (34.9 ± 5.13 N cm) than the inexperienced clinicians (p = 0.048).

Conclusion

Within the limitation of this study, the use of MTLDs did not always produce consistent torque values and the technique by which the operators use the MTLD might affect the torque value.

How to cite this article

Al-Otaibi HN. Intended and Achieved Torque of Implant Abutment's Screw using Manual Wrenches in Simulated Clinical Setting. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016;17(11):897-901.


PDF Share
  1. A systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implant-supported single crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008 Feb;19(2):119-130.
  2. Impact of screw retained versus cement retained implantsupported prosthesis on peri-implantitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Dent Med J Adv Res 2015;1:1-6.
  3. Implant screw mechanics. Dent Clin North Am 1998 Jan;42(1):71-89.
  4. Implant screw mechanics and the settling effect: overview. J Oral Implantol 2003;29(5):242-245.
  5. Effect of preload torque on the ultimate tensile strength of implant prosthetic retaining screws. Implant Dent 1994 Spring;3(1):17-21.
  6. A measurement of torque values obtained with hand-held drivers in a simulated clinical setting. Int J Prosthodont 1993 Dec;2(4):212-214.
  7. Accuracy of friction-style and spring-style mechanical torque limiting devices for dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 2008 Aug;100(2):86-92.
  8. Accuracy of mechanical torque-limiting devices for implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002 Mar-Apr;17(2):220-224.
  9. Evaluation of the accuracy and related factors of the mechanical torquelimiting device for dental implants. J Dent (Tehran) 2013 Mar;10(2):112-118.
  10. Accuracy of mechanical torque-limiting gauges for mini-screw placement. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010 Aug;21(8):781-788.
  11. Torque generated by handheld screwdrivers and mechanical torquing devices for osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994 Mar-Apr;9(2):149-155.
  12. ; Lang, B.R.; Rubenstein, J.E. Osseointegration in dentistry: an overview. 2nd ed. Chicago; London: Quintessence; 2003. ix, 174 p.
  13. Measurement of clinicians’ ability to hand torque dental implant components. J Oral Implantol 2009;35(4):185-188.
  14. Implant abutment screw torque generated by general dentists using a hand driver in a limited access space simulating the mouth. J Oral Implantol 2007;33(5):277-279.
  15. Dentists’ age and manual dexterity. Are younger or older dentists better practitioners? Gen Dent 1994 Jan-Feb;42(1):88-90.
  16. Relationship between implant preload and screw loosening on implant-supported prostheses. J Oral Implantol 2002;28(2):67-73.
  17. Elongation and preload stress in dental implant abutment screws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995 Sep-Oct;10(5):529-536.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.