The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Volume  25 (2024)
Volume  24 (2023)
Volume  23 (2022)
Volume  22 (2021)
Volume  21 (2020)
Volume  20 (2019)
Volume  19 (2018)
Volume  18 (2017)
Volume  17 (2016)
Volume  16 (2015)
Volume  15 (2014)
Volume  14 (2013)
Volume  13 (2012)
Volume  12 (2011)
Volume  11 (2010)
Volume  10 (2009)
Volume  9 (2008)
Volume  8 (2007)
Volume  7 (2006)
Volume  6 (2005)
Volume  5 (2004)
Volume  4 (2003)
Volume  3 (2002)
Volume  2 (2001)
Volume  1 (1999)
Related articles

VOLUME 18 , ISSUE 3 ( March, 2017 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Evaluating Various Preparation Protocols on the Shear Bond Strength of Repaired Composite

Ayah A Al-Asmar, Khaled S Hatamleh, Muhanad Hatamleh, Mohammad Al-Rabab'ah

Citation Information : Al-Asmar AA, Hatamleh KS, Hatamleh M, Al-Rabab'ah M. Evaluating Various Preparation Protocols on the Shear Bond Strength of Repaired Composite. J Contemp Dent Pract 2017; 18 (3):182-187.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2013

Published Online: 01-07-2017

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2017; The Author(s).


Abstract

Introduction

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of different combinations of various surface treatments on the shear bond strength (SBS) of repaired composite resin.

Materials and methods

A total of 122 composite samples were prepared from Filtek Z350 XT. Samples were light cured and stored for 6 weeks. Surface treatment of old composite was done in five groups: Group I: bur roughening + phosphoric acid etching, group II: bur roughening + hydrofluoric acid etching + silane coupling agent, group II: air abrasion + phosphoric acid etching, group IV: air abrasion + phosphoric acid etching + silane coupling agent, group V: air abrasion + hydrofluoric acid etching + silane coupling agent. Bonding agent was applied to all surface-treated old composites and light cured. The fresh composite resin was bonded to treated surfaces and cured and stored in water at 37°C for 6 weeks. Shear bond strength was measured by a universal testing machine.

Results

Shear bond strength values of all groups were not statistically significant except for group V, which showed statistically significant higher SBS than group III.

Conclusion

Techniques with readily available materials at the clinic can attain similar SBS to more elaborate technique involving potentially hazardous materials.

How to cite this article

Al-Asmar AA, Hatamleh KS, Hatamleh M, Al-Rabab'ah M. Evaluating Various Preparation Protocols on the Shear Bond Strength of Repaired Composite. J Contemp Dent Pract 2017;18(3):182-187.

PDF Share
  1. Resin-based composite margin repair. Inside Dent 2008 Jun;4(6) [cited 2015 Oct 04]. Available from: https://www.dentalaegis.com/id
  2. Small cross-sectional survey of composite restoration attributes associated with choices for replacement. Braz Oral Res 2009 Jul-Sep;23(3):346-351.
  3. Replacement versus repair of defective restorations in adults: resin composite (Review). The Cochrane Collaboration. Vol. 2. United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons; 2010. p. 1-13.
  4. Clinical decision-making for restoration replacement or repair. Inside Dentistry. 2012:2-6 [cited 2015 Oct 04]. Available from: https://www.dentalaegis.com/id.
  5. Effect of various surface treatments on repair strength of composite resin. J Dent TUMS 2004;1(4):5-11.
  6. Microleakage at the composite-repair interface: effect of different adhesive systems. J Appl Oral Sci 2004 Sep;12(3):219-222.
  7. Shear bond strength of immediately repaired light-cured composite resin restorations. Oper Dent 1998 Mar-Apr;23(3):121-127.
  8. The effect of bonding agents on the interfacial bond strength of repaired composites. Dent Mater 1986 Aug;2(4):153-155.
  9. Repair of an aged, contaminated indirect composite resin with a direct, visible-light-cured composite resin. Oper Dent 1993 Sep-Oct;18(5):187-194.
  10. The effect of various surface treatments and bonding agents on the repaired strength of heat-treated composites. J Prosthet Dent 2001 Nov;86(5):481-488.
  11. Evaluation of varied repair protocols applied to aged composite resin. J Adhes Dent 2005 Spring;7(1):41-49.
  12. Shear bond strength of self-etching bonding systems in combination with various composites used for repairing aged composites. J Adhes Dent 2005 Summer;7(2):159-164.
  13. The role of oxygen inhibited layer on the shear bond strength of composites: an in-vitro evaluation. J Conserv Dent 2007 Jan;10(1):1-4.
  14. Effect of combinations of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites. J Prosthet Dent 1997 Feb;77(2):122-126.
  15. Shear bond strength of repaired composites using surface treatments and repair materials: an in vitro study. J Int Oral Health 2014 Nov-Dec;6(6):22-25.
  16. Initial repair bond strength of a nano-filled hybrid resin: effect of surface treatments and bonding agents. J Esthet Restor Dent 2009;21(4):251-260.
  17. Effect of three surface treatments on the adhesive properties of indirect composite restorations. J Adhes Dent 2007 Jun;9(3):319-326.
  18. The influence of different surface pretreatments on the shear bond strength of repaired composite. J Am Sci 2011;7(7):705-711.
  19. Assessment of dye penetration at composite – repair interface: effect of application of bonding agent and comparison of two different bonding systems – an in vitro study. J Contemp Dent 2010 Dec;1(2):34-38.
  20. Surface treatment techniques for resin composite repair. Am J Dent 1997 Dec;10(6):279-283.
  21. Composite-to-composite microtensile bond strength in the repair of a microfilled hybrid resin: effect of surface treatment and oxygen inhibition. J Adhes Dent 2007 Feb;9(1):25-31.
  22. Bond strength of repaired anterior composite resins: an in vitro study. J Dent 1998 Nov;26(8):685-694.
  23. Comparison of acidulated phosphate fluoride gel and hydrofluoric acid etchants for porcelain-composite repair. J Prosthet Dent 1994 Aug;72:121-127.
  24. Surface roughness of etched composite resin in light of composite repair. J Dent 2011 Jul;39(7):499-505.
  25. Effect of different acid treatments on a porcelain surface. J Oral Rehabil 2001 Jan;28(1):95-101.
  26. Effect of etchant type and the use of silane on the shear bond strength of composite resin to porcelain. J Bagh Coll Dent 2011;23(4):1-6.
  27. Tooth-colored restoratives. Principles and techniques. London: BC Decker Inc.; 2002.
  28. An evaluation of different materials for surface treatment on microleakage of repaired composite resin restoration. Al Rafidain Dent J 2009;9(2):189-193.
  29. Bonding of composite to water aged composite with surface treatments. Dent Mater 2007 Apr;23(4):519-525.
  30. Effect of surface treatments on microtensile bond strength of repaired aged silorane resin composite. Oper Dent 2013 Jan-Feb;38(1):91-99.
  31. The repair of direct composite restorations: an international survey of the teaching of operative techniques and materials. Eur J Dent Educ 2003 Feb;7(1):41-48.
  32. Teaching students the repair of resin-based composite restorations: a survey of North American dental schools. J Am Dent Assoc 2003 Mar;134(3):317-323.
  33. Influence of surface treatments on the bond strength of repaired resin composite restorative materials. Dent Mater 2009 Apr;25(4):442-451.
  34. Effect of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2007;19(2):90-98.
  35. Effect of physicochemical aging conditions on the composite-composite repair bond strength. J Adhes Dent 2007 Aug;9(4):399-406.
  36. Effect of surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of repaired water-aged anterior restorative micro-fine hybrid resin composite. J Dent 2008 Dec;36:969-976.
  37. Evaluation of interfacial bond strength of repaired composite resins. J Bagh Coll Dent 2006;18(2):32-34.
  38. Bond strengths of repaired laboratory composites using three surface treatments and three primers. Am J Dent 2004 Apr;17(2):123-126.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.