The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 18 , ISSUE 4 ( April, 2017 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Influence of Mechanical and Chemical Degradation in the Surface Roughness, Gloss, and Color of Microhybrid Composites

Cleidiel AA Lemos, Silvio J Mauro, Paulo H dos Santos, André LF Briso, Ticiane C Fagundes

Citation Information : Lemos CA, Mauro SJ, dos Santos PH, Briso AL, Fagundes TC. Influence of Mechanical and Chemical Degradation in the Surface Roughness, Gloss, and Color of Microhybrid Composites. J Contemp Dent Pract 2017; 18 (4):283-288.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2032

Published Online: 01-04-2017

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2017; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

The aim of this study was to investigate the association of different degradations on the roughness, gloss, and color changes of microhybrid composites.

Materials and methods

Ten specimens were prepared for Charisma, Amelogen Plus, Point 4, and Opallis resins. Surfaces were polished and baseline measurements of roughness, gloss, and color were recorded. Specimens were then submitted to chemical and mechanical challenges, and the specimens were reevaluated. Roughness and gloss were analyzed by Kruskal – Wallis and Dunn's test (p < 0.05). Color change (ΔE) was analyzed by one-way analysis of variance and Tukey's tests (p < 0.05). The initial and final data were compared using the Wilcoxon test (p < 0.05). Spearman test checked the correlation between the roughness and gloss (p < 0.05).

Results

Regarding surface roughness and gloss, there was no difference between composites before challenges. However, all composites showed a significant increase of roughness after challenges, with highest values for Charisma. The gloss was influenced by challenges, evidencing the best gloss for Point 4. Charisma showed the highest value of color change. There was no correlation between surface roughness and gloss for the initial analysis, and after the challenges.

Conclusion

Composites were influenced by association of challenges, and Charisma showed the highest changes for roughness, gloss, and color.

Clinical significance

The type of composite resin influenced the properties of materials, which are surface roughness, gloss, and color change. The dentist should be aware of the performance of different brands, to choose the correct required composite resin for each type of patient or region to be restored.

How to cite this article

Lemos CAA, Mauro SJ, dos Santos PH, Briso ALF, Fagundes TC. Influence of Mechanical and Chemical Degradation in the Surface Roughness, Gloss, and Color of Microhybrid Composites. J Contemp Dent Pract 2017;18(4):283-288.


PDF Share
  1. Effects of acidulated phosphate fluoride gel application on surface roughness, gloss and colour of different type resin composites. J Dent 2011 Oct;39(10):700-706.
  2. Investigation of mechanical properties of modern dental composites after artificial aging for one year. Oper Dent 2010 Jul-Aug;35(4):412-419.
  3. Marginal quality of posterior microhybrid resin composite restorations applied using two polymerisation protocols: 5-year randomised split mouth trial. J Dent 2013 May;41(5):436-442.
  4. Randomized controlled split-mouth clinical trial of direct laminate veneers with two micro-hybrid resin composites. J Dent 2012 Sep;40(9):766-775.
  5. Composite resins. A review of the materials and clinical indications. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2006 Mar;11(2):E215-E220.
  6. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater 1997 Jul;13(4):258-269.
  7. Effect of chemical degradation followed by toothbrushing on the surface roughness of restorative composites. J Appl Oral Sci 2010 Dec;18(6):585-590.
  8. Influence of chemical degradation on the surface properties of nano restorative materials. Oper Dent 2014 May-Jun;39(3):E109-E117.
  9. Effect of toothbrushing-mouthrinse-cycling on surface roughness and topography of nanofilled, microfilled, and microhybrid resin composites. Oper Dent 2014 Sep-Oct;39(5):521-529.
  10. Resin composite – state of the art. Dent Mater 2011 Jan;27(1):29-38.
  11. In vitro evaluation of surface roughness and microhardness of restorative materials submitted to erosive challenges. Oper Dent 2011 Jul-Aug;36(4):397-402.
  12. Influence of different drinks on the colour stability of dental resin composites. Eur J Dent 2009 Jan;3(1):50-56.
  13. Surface roughness of different dental materials before and after simulated toothbrushing in vitro. Oper Dent 2005 Sep-Oct;30(5):617-626.
  14. 1 year clinical evaluation of microhybrid composites used in the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions. Oral Health Dent Manag 2014 Jun;13(2):366-371.
  15. Longitudinal evaluation of simulated toothbrushing on the roughness and optical stability of microfilled, microhybrid and nanofilled resin-based composites. J Dent 2013 Nov;41(11):1081-1090.
  16. Color stability of microfilled, microhybrid and nanocomposite resins – an in vitro study. J Dent 2010 Jun;38(Suppl 2):e137-e142.
  17. Effect of acidic solutions on the surface degradation of a micro-hybrid composite resin. Braz Dent J 2014;25(4):321-326.
  18. Surface characterization of current composites after toothbrush abrasion. Dent Mater J 2013 Feb;32(1):75-82.
  19. Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in dental polymer networks. Dent Mater 2006 Mar;22(3):211-222.
  20. Surface deterioration of dental materials after simulated toothbrushing in relation to brushing time and load. Dent Mater 2010 Apr;26(4):306-319.
  21. Surface characteristics of resin composite materials after finishing and polishing. Gen Dent 2015 Mar-Apr;63(2):26-32.
  22. Changes in gloss after simulated generalized wear of composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 2005 Oct;94(4):370-376.
  23. Evaluation of surface characteristics of dental composites using profilometry, scanning electron, atomic force microscopy and gloss-meter. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2007 Jan;18(1):155-163.
  24. Perceptibility and acceptability thresholds for colour differences in dentistry. J Dent 2014 Jun;42(6):637-644.
  25. Effect of salivary esterase on the integrity and fracture toughness of the dentin-resin interface. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2010 Jul;94(1):230-237.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.