The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 18 , ISSUE 4 ( April, 2017 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Wire Roughness Assessment of 0.016″ × 0.022″ the Technique Lingual Orthodontics

Fátima MM Facchini, Mario Vedovello Filho, Silvia AS Vedovello, Flávio A Cotrim, Andréa Cotrim-Ferreira, Carlos AM Tubel

Citation Information : Facchini FM, Filho MV, Vedovello SA, Cotrim FA, Cotrim-Ferreira A, Tubel CA. Wire Roughness Assessment of 0.016″ × 0.022″ the Technique Lingual Orthodontics. J Contemp Dent Pract 2017; 18 (4):295-299.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2034

Published Online: 01-04-2017

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2017; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the difference in surface roughness of stainless steel archwires of different commercial brands used in lingual orthodontics.

Materials and methods

Precontoured arches measuring 0.016″ × 0.022″ were selected of the following brands: Tecnident, Adenta, G&H, Highland Metals Inc., Ormco, Incognito, and Ebraces. Quantitative evaluation of the surface roughness of archwires was performed by means of an atomic force microscope in contact mode. Three surface readouts were taken of each sample, analyzing areas of 20 × 20 μm. Each scan of the samples produced a readout of 512 lines, generating threedimensional images of the wires. The analysis of variance statistical test was applied to prove significant variables (p > 0.05), with H0 being rejected and H1 accepted.

Results

The Incognito brand showed the lowest surface roughness. The archwires of brands Adenta, Tecnident, Highland, and Ormco showed similar values among them, and all close to these obtained by the Incognito brand. The archwires of the Ebraces brand showed the highest surface roughness, with values being close to those of the G&H Brand.

Conclusion

There was a statistical difference in surface roughness of orthodontic archwires among the brands studied.

Clinical significance

Companies should pay attention to the quality control of their materials, as these may directly affect the quality of orthodontic treatment.

How to cite this article

Facchini FMM, Filho MV, Vedovello SAS, Cotrim FA, Cotrim-Ferreira A, Tubel CAM. Wire Roughness Assessment of 0.016″ × 0.022″ the Technique Lingual Orthodontics. J Contemp Dent Pract 2017;18(4):295-299.


PDF Share
  1. Tecnologias digitais e sistemas CAD/CAM aplicados à ortodontia lingual: O futuro já é realidade atual. Dent Press J Orthod 2011 Mar-Apr;16(2):22-27.
  2. Uma entrevista com Didier Fillion. Dent Press J Orthod 2011 Jan-Feb;16(1):22-28.
  3. Coating stability and surface characteristics of esthetic orthodontic coated archwires. Angle Orthod 2013 Nov;83(6):994-1001.
  4. Avaliação do perfil de braquetes metálicos da técnica ortodôntica lingual. Rev Ortodontia SPO 2014 Mar-Jun;47(3):218-223.
  5. A subjective comparison of two lingual bracket systems. Eur J Orthod 2005 Aug;27(4):420-426.
  6. Conforto e fonação com a nova geração de bráquetes ortodônticos linguais individualizados. Rev CEFAC 2009 Oct-Dec;11(4):701-707.
  7. Lingual straightwire treatment with the Orapix system. J Clin Orthod 2011 Sep;45(9):488-497.
  8. Therapeutic accuracy of individualized brackets in lingual orthodontics. J Orofac Orthop 2010 Sep;71(5):348-361.
  9. Uso de faceta estética provisória em tratamento ortodôntico com extração na técnica lingual. Rev Ortodontia SPO 2011 Jul;44(3):247-252.
  10. A comparative in vitro study of frictional resistance between lingual brackets and stainless steel archwires. Eur J Orthod 2012 Feb;34(1):119-125.
  11. Avaliação da rugosidade superficial de fios ortodônticos indicados para a retração dental anterior em ortodontia lingual. Rev Ortodontia SPO 2014;47(2):67-73.
  12. Variations in surface roughness of seven orthodontic archwires: An SEM-profilometry study. Korean J Orthod 2012 Jun;42(3):129-137.
  13. Evaluation of surface roughness of orthodontic wires by means of atomic force microscopy. Angle Orthod 2012 Sep;82(5):922-928.
  14. Microscopia de varredura por força: Uma ferramenta poderosa no estudo de polímeros. Polím Ciên Tecnol 1997 Oct-Dec;51-61.
  15. Iatrogenic possibilities of orthodontic treatment and modalities of prevention. J Orthod Sci 2013 Jul-Sep;2(3):73-86.
  16. Lever-arm and mini-implant system for anterior torque control during retraction in lingual orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 2005 Jan;75(1):129-141.
  17. Composição química e aspecto superficial do slot de braquetes metálicos. Dent Press J Orthod 2008 May-Jun;13(3):85-96.
  18. Influence of different staining beverages on color stability, surface roughness and microhardness of silorane and methacrylate-based composite resins. J Contemp Dent Pract 2014 May 1;15(3):319-325.
  19. Orthodontic material applications over the past century: evolution of research methods to address clinical queries. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015 May;147 (Suppl 5):S224-S231.
  20. Corrosion resistance of three orthodontic brackets: a comparative study of three fluoride mouthwashes. Eur J Orthod 2005 Dec;27(6):541-549.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.