The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Volume  25 (2024)
Volume  24 (2023)
Volume  23 (2022)
Volume  22 (2021)
Volume  21 (2020)
Volume  20 (2019)
Volume  19 (2018)
Volume  18 (2017)
Volume  17 (2016)
Volume  16 (2015)
Volume  15 (2014)
Volume  14 (2013)
Volume  13 (2012)
Volume  12 (2011)
Volume  11 (2010)
Volume  10 (2009)
Volume  9 (2008)
Volume  8 (2007)
Volume  7 (2006)
Volume  6 (2005)
Volume  5 (2004)
Volume  4 (2003)
Volume  3 (2002)
Volume  2 (2001)
Volume  1 (1999)
Related articles

VOLUME 18 , ISSUE 7 ( July, 2017 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

An Innovative Approach to Retention: Thermoplastic Retainer

Sumitha A David, KA Adam Ozeer, Umar Mohamed, PC Sunil, Parson Paul

Citation Information : David SA, Ozeer KA, Mohamed U, Sunil P, Paul P. An Innovative Approach to Retention: Thermoplastic Retainer. J Contemp Dent Pract 2017; 18 (7):572-575.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2086

Published Online: 01-10-2017

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2017; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim

The aim of this study was to design and introduce a retainer that overcomes the common shortcomings seen in other retainers.

Materials and methods

Hard thermoplastic sheet of 0.5 mm thickness is vacuum or pressure-molded onto the patient cast. Lingual portion of the retainer is trimmed according to the contours of the anterior teeth. Contact points between the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth are marked on the retainer and reduced. Punch cut holes are placed on the retainer for the exit of flash and air bubbles while fixation. The retainer is bonded onto the lingual surface of the anterior teeth using composite.

Results

A 1-month review of the retainer showed no patient discomfort, occlusal interference, or bond failure. The aim of the article was found to have been achieved.

Conclusion

Initial evaluation has shown positive findings. Long-term clinical findings will determine the overall success of this new retainer.

Clinical significance

As compared with other retainers, thermoplastic retainer has shown reduced tendency to debond from occlusal forces, decreased patient discomfort, and occlusal interference.

How to cite this article

Ozeer KAA, David SA, Mohamed U, Sunil PC, Paul S, Paul P. An Innovative Approach to Retention: Thermoplastic Retainer. J Contemp Dent Pract 2017; 18(7):572-575.

PDF Share
  1. Handbook of orthodontics for the student and general practitioner. 3rd ed. Chicago: Yearbook; 1973. p. 442.
  2. Orthodontic bonded retainers. J Ir Dent Assoc 2005 Spring;51(1):29-32.
  3. Stability and side effects of orthodontic retainers – a systematic review. Dentistry 2014 Jan;4(9):258.
  4. Long-term experience with direct-bonded retainers: update and clinical advice. J Clin Orthod 2007 Dec;41(12):728-737.
  5. Occlusal contact changes with removable and bonded retainers in a 1-year retention period. Angle Orthod 2009 Sep;79(5):867-872.
  6. Upper bonded retainers. Angle Orthod 2011 Nov;81(6):1050-1056.
  7. Effects of thermoplastic retainers on occlusal contacts. Eur J Orthod 2010 Feb;32(1):6-10.
  8. Comparison of survival time between two types of orthodontic fixed retainer: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Prog Orthod 2013 Sep;14:25.
  9. Accelerated aging effects on surface hardness and roughness of lingual retainer adhesives. Angle Orthod 2008 Jan;78(1):140-144.
  10. Comparison of retention characteristics of essix and hawley retainers. Korean J Orthod 2012 Oct;42(5):255-262.
  11. Removable thermoplastic appliances as orthodontic retainers: a prospective study of different wear regimens. Eur J Orthod 2012 Aug;34(4):475-479.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.