The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Volume  25 (2024)
Volume  24 (2023)
Volume  23 (2022)
Volume  22 (2021)
Volume  21 (2020)
Volume  20 (2019)
Volume  19 (2018)
Volume  18 (2017)
Volume  17 (2016)
Volume  16 (2015)
Volume  15 (2014)
Volume  14 (2013)
Volume  13 (2012)
Volume  12 (2011)
Volume  11 (2010)
Volume  10 (2009)
Volume  9 (2008)
Volume  8 (2007)
Volume  7 (2006)
Volume  6 (2005)
Volume  5 (2004)
Volume  4 (2003)
Volume  3 (2002)
Volume  2 (2001)
Volume  1 (1999)
Related articles

VOLUME 4 , ISSUE 1 ( February, 2003 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

The Effect of Different Drying Methods for Single Step Adhesive Systems on Microleakage of Tooth Colored Restorations

Barry M. Owens

Citation Information : Owens BM. The Effect of Different Drying Methods for Single Step Adhesive Systems on Microleakage of Tooth Colored Restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract 2003; 4 (1):1-9.

DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-4-1-1

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 01-08-2005

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2003; The Author(s).


Abstract

Citation

Owens BM. The Effect of Different Drying Methods for Single Step Adhesive Systems on Microleakage of Tooth Colored Restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract 2003 February;(4)1:001-009.

PDF Share
  1. Tooth-colored restoratives: An introduction text for selecting, placing and finishing direct systems. Santa Rosa: Alto Books, 1996;6a-1-6a-9.
  2. Resin-Enamel bonding. In: Esthetic Composite Bonding: Techniques and Materials. 2nd ed, St. Louis: Mosby, 1993;24.
  3. Characterization of first generation flowable composites. J Am Dent Assoc. 1998 May;129(5):567-77.
  4. Dentin Adhesives and microleakage in cervical resin composites. Am J Dent. 1992 Oct;5(5):240-4.
  5. Fluid exchange at the margins of dental restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1952;44:288-295.
  6. The competition between the composite dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res. 1984 Dec;63(12):1396-9.
  7. The effect of temperature change on adaptation of fillings. Acta Odontol Scand. 1974;32(3):161-71. No abstract available.
  8. Effect of coefficient of thermal expansion on microleakage. J Am Dent Assoc 1988;116:871-874.
  9. Current concepts in dentin bonding: focusing on dentinal adhesion factors. J Am Dent Assoc. 1993 May;124(5):26-36. Review.
  10. Contraction under composite resin restorations: effect of hygroscopic expansion and thermal stress. Oper Dent. 1988 Winter;13(1):24-31. No abstract available.
  11. Marginal adaptation of posterior resins: effect of dentin bonding agent and hygroscopic expansion. Dent Mater. 1989 Mar;5(2):122-6.
  12. Microleakage of composite resin restorations: a status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent. 1989 Aug;2(4):175-80. Review. No abstract available.
  13. Current concepts on adhesion to dentin. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1997;8(3):306-35. Review.
  14. Dentin bonding: past and present. Gen Dent. 1996 Nov-Dec;44(6):498-507; quiz 515-6. Review.
  15. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955;34(6):849-853.
  16. Microleakage of five dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater. 1989 Nov;5(6):415-6.
  17. Effects of etchants, surface moisture, and resin composite on dentin bond strengths. Am J Dent. 1993 Apr;6(2):61-4.
  18. Effect of desiccation on microleakage of five Class 5 restorative materials. Oper Dent. 1996 May-Jun;21(3):90-5.
  19. Effect of rinse time on microleakage between composite and etched enamel. Oper Dent. 1993 Jan-Feb;18(1):37-40.
  20. Smear layer: Physiological considerations. Oper Dent Suppl. 1984313-29. No abstract available.
  21. Smear layer: Pathological and treatment considerations. Oper dent 1984 (Supplement 3):35-42.
  22. Marginal leakage of filled dentin adhesive used with wet and dry bonding techniques. Am J Dent. 2000 Apr;13(2):93-7.
  23. Microleakage of hydrophilic adhesive systems in Class V composite restorations. Am J Dent 2001;14(1):31-33.
  24. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents. Am J Dent. 2001 Jun;14(3):132-6.
  25. Comparison of microleakage for three one-bottle and three multiple-step dentin bonding agents. J Prosthet Dent. 1999 Aug;82(2):209-13.
  26. Am J Dent. 1996 Dec;9(6):245-8.
  27. Microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations using five simplified adhesive systems. Am J Dent. 1999 Dec;12(6):291-4.
  28. Microleakage of new all-in-one adhesive systems on dentinal and enamel margins. Quintessence Int. 2002 Feb;33(2):136-9.
  29. Microleakage of direct and indirect composite restorations with three dentin bonding agents. Oper Dent. 2002 Jan-Feb;27(1):19-24.
  30. Effect of dentin adhesives on the enamel-dentin/ composite interface microleakage. Am J Dent. 2001 Dec;14(6):344-8.
  31. Morphological field emission-SEM study of the effect of six phosphoric acid etching agents on human dentin. Dent Mater. 1996 Jul;12(4):262-71.
  32. Rubber dam usage related to restoration quality and survival. Br Dent J. 1993 May 8;174(9):330-3.
  33. The efficacy of the rubber dam as a barrier to the spread of microorganisms during dental treatment. J Am Dent Assoc. 1989 Jul;119(1):141-4.
  34. Detection of microleakage around dental restorations: a review. Oper Dent. 1997 Jul-Aug;22(4):173-85. Review. No abstract available.
  35. Nanoleakage at the Composite-dentin interface: a review. Am J Dent. 2001 Aug;14(4):252-8. Review.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.