The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 4 , ISSUE 1 ( February, 2003 ) > List of Articles


The Effect of Different Drying Methods for Single Step Adhesive Systems on Microleakage of Tooth Colored Restorations

Barry M. Owens

Citation Information : Owens BM. The Effect of Different Drying Methods for Single Step Adhesive Systems on Microleakage of Tooth Colored Restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract 2003; 4 (1):1-9.

DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-4-1-1

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 01-08-2005

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2003; The Author(s).



Owens BM. The Effect of Different Drying Methods for Single Step Adhesive Systems on Microleakage of Tooth Colored Restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract 2003 February;(4)1:001-009.

PDF Share
  1. Tooth-colored restoratives: An introduction text for selecting, placing and finishing direct systems. Santa Rosa: Alto Books, 1996;6a-1-6a-9.
  2. Resin-Enamel bonding. In: Esthetic Composite Bonding: Techniques and Materials. 2nd ed, St. Louis: Mosby, 1993;24.
  3. Characterization of first generation flowable composites. J Am Dent Assoc. 1998 May;129(5):567-77.
  4. Dentin Adhesives and microleakage in cervical resin composites. Am J Dent. 1992 Oct;5(5):240-4.
  5. Fluid exchange at the margins of dental restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1952;44:288-295.
  6. The competition between the composite dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res. 1984 Dec;63(12):1396-9.
  7. The effect of temperature change on adaptation of fillings. Acta Odontol Scand. 1974;32(3):161-71. No abstract available.
  8. Effect of coefficient of thermal expansion on microleakage. J Am Dent Assoc 1988;116:871-874.
  9. Current concepts in dentin bonding: focusing on dentinal adhesion factors. J Am Dent Assoc. 1993 May;124(5):26-36. Review.
  10. Contraction under composite resin restorations: effect of hygroscopic expansion and thermal stress. Oper Dent. 1988 Winter;13(1):24-31. No abstract available.
  11. Marginal adaptation of posterior resins: effect of dentin bonding agent and hygroscopic expansion. Dent Mater. 1989 Mar;5(2):122-6.
  12. Microleakage of composite resin restorations: a status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent. 1989 Aug;2(4):175-80. Review. No abstract available.
  13. Current concepts on adhesion to dentin. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1997;8(3):306-35. Review.
  14. Dentin bonding: past and present. Gen Dent. 1996 Nov-Dec;44(6):498-507; quiz 515-6. Review.
  15. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955;34(6):849-853.
  16. Microleakage of five dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater. 1989 Nov;5(6):415-6.
  17. Effects of etchants, surface moisture, and resin composite on dentin bond strengths. Am J Dent. 1993 Apr;6(2):61-4.
  18. Effect of desiccation on microleakage of five Class 5 restorative materials. Oper Dent. 1996 May-Jun;21(3):90-5.
  19. Effect of rinse time on microleakage between composite and etched enamel. Oper Dent. 1993 Jan-Feb;18(1):37-40.
  20. Smear layer: Physiological considerations. Oper Dent Suppl. 1984313-29. No abstract available.
  21. Smear layer: Pathological and treatment considerations. Oper dent 1984 (Supplement 3):35-42.
  22. Marginal leakage of filled dentin adhesive used with wet and dry bonding techniques. Am J Dent. 2000 Apr;13(2):93-7.
  23. Microleakage of hydrophilic adhesive systems in Class V composite restorations. Am J Dent 2001;14(1):31-33.
  24. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents. Am J Dent. 2001 Jun;14(3):132-6.
  25. Comparison of microleakage for three one-bottle and three multiple-step dentin bonding agents. J Prosthet Dent. 1999 Aug;82(2):209-13.
  26. Am J Dent. 1996 Dec;9(6):245-8.
  27. Microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations using five simplified adhesive systems. Am J Dent. 1999 Dec;12(6):291-4.
  28. Microleakage of new all-in-one adhesive systems on dentinal and enamel margins. Quintessence Int. 2002 Feb;33(2):136-9.
  29. Microleakage of direct and indirect composite restorations with three dentin bonding agents. Oper Dent. 2002 Jan-Feb;27(1):19-24.
  30. Effect of dentin adhesives on the enamel-dentin/ composite interface microleakage. Am J Dent. 2001 Dec;14(6):344-8.
  31. Morphological field emission-SEM study of the effect of six phosphoric acid etching agents on human dentin. Dent Mater. 1996 Jul;12(4):262-71.
  32. Rubber dam usage related to restoration quality and survival. Br Dent J. 1993 May 8;174(9):330-3.
  33. The efficacy of the rubber dam as a barrier to the spread of microorganisms during dental treatment. J Am Dent Assoc. 1989 Jul;119(1):141-4.
  34. Detection of microleakage around dental restorations: a review. Oper Dent. 1997 Jul-Aug;22(4):173-85. Review. No abstract available.
  35. Nanoleakage at the Composite-dentin interface: a review. Am J Dent. 2001 Aug;14(4):252-8. Review.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.