The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 6 , ISSUE 4 ( November, 2005 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

The Significance of Marginal Gap and Overextension Measurement in the Evaluation of the Fit of Complete Crowns

Arne F. Boeckler, Anke Stadler, Jürgen M. Setz

Citation Information : Boeckler AF, Stadler A, Setz JM. The Significance of Marginal Gap and Overextension Measurement in the Evaluation of the Fit of Complete Crowns. J Contemp Dent Pract 2005; 6 (4):26-37.

DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-6-4-26

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 01-11-2005

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2005; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Introduction

An important criterion for the success of a crown is marginal fit. However, in the patient's mouth fit can only be evaluated by subjective methods. This study describes the correlation between objective marginal fit and its subjective evaluation by dentists and dental technicians.

Materials and Methods

Thirty human premolars and molars were randomly divided into six groups and prepared with a shoulder. For each of the six groups, complete crowns were made of different alloys and technologies (casting: AuAgCu, AuPdPt, PdAgAu, CoCrMo, and Ti; milling: Ti). The crowns were cemented with provisional cement. Ten dentists and 10 technicians were asked to evaluate the fit of the crowns with a new dental explorer. The crowns were then cleaned and cemented with a zinc-oxide-phosphate-cement. The marginal gap and a possible overextended margin of the crowns were examined under a special 4x light microscope with a magnification level of 560 X. The means of the gaps and the overextended margins were calculated for each group. Significances were detected by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the post-hoctest (Bonferroni, p<0.05). Correlations between objective measuring and subjective evaluation were evaluated using the Pearson test. The influence of the measured values on the subjective evaluation was determined by regression analyses.

Results

Crowns made from different alloys and technologies showed partly significantly (p<0.05) different marginal gaps (mean ranging from 35ìm to 92ìm) and significantly (p<0.05) different overextended margins (mean ranging from 40ìm to 149ìm). There were significant correlations (p<0.05) between subjective findings and objective data. Significant correlations (p<0.01) were also found between the subjective findings of dentists and technicians. Compared to the marginal gap, only the overextended margin had a significant influence (p=0.00) on the subjective evaluations of the clinicians.

Conclusion

Crowns from different alloys and technologies showed differences in marginal fit. Marginal gap and the overextension of the crowns significantly correlated with the subjective evaluation of their fit by dentists and dental technicians. For the decision of the clinicians, whether a crown is acceptable, overextension was more important than marginal gap.

Citation

Boeckler AF, Stadler A, Setz JM. The Significance of Marginal Gap and Overextension Measurement in the Evaluation of the Fit of Complete Crowns. J Contemp Dent Pract 2005 November; (6)4:026-037.


PDF Share
  1. Effect of crown margins on periodontal conditions in regulary attending patients. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:75.
  2. The margin of crowns and fillings [Der Kronen- und Füllungsrand]. Dtsch Zahnaerztl Z 1990;45:380.
  3. Effect of restoration quality on periodontal health. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:15.
  4. Unserviceable crowns and fixed partial dentures: lifespan and causes for loss of serviceability. J Amer Dent Ass 1970;81:1995.
  5. Effect of in vivo crown margin discrepancies on periodontal health. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:357-364.
  6. Practical test of crowns and inlays [Die praktische Bewährung von Krone und Inlay]. Dtsch Zahnaerztl Z 1981;36:243.
  7. Retention period and clinical findings of fixed restorations [Verweildauer und klinische Befunde bei Kronen und Brücken]. Dtsch Zahnaerztl Z 1992;47:315-319
  8. A survey of crown and fixed partial denture failures: length of service and reasons for replacement. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56:416-421.
  9. Considerations in measurements of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:405.
  10. Early erosion of glass-ionomer cement at crown margins. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:553-557.
  11. Retentive strength, disintegration, and marginal quality of luting cements. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:269-274.
  12. An investigation of dental luting cement solubility as a function of the marginal gap. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:436-442.
  13. The marginal accuracy of treatment restorations: a comparative analysis. J Prosthet Dent 1980;44:283-290.
  14. Marginal fit of gold inlay castings. J Prosthet Dent 1966;16:297-305.
  15. Disparity in expert opinions on size of acceptable margin openings. Operative Dent 1982;7:97-101.
  16. Standardized margin of a crown? - a clinical analysis [Normierter Kronenrand? - Eine klinische Analyse]. In: Heners W eds. Quality assurance in dentistry. Demand and reality [Qualitätssicherung in der Zahnheilkunde. Anspruch und Wirklichkeit]. Heidelberg: Hüthig; 1995:19-45.
  17. Marginal gap and quality of cast crowns from five dental laboratories [Kronenrandschluß und Konturqualität in fünf Dentallaboratorien]. Dtsch Zahnaerztl Z 1998;53:620-623.
  18. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of clinically cemented cast gold restaurations. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:664-669.
  19. Crowns [Kronenersatz]. In: Hupfauf L eds. Fixed prosthodontic restaurations [Festsitzender Zahnersatz]. München, Wien, Baltimore: Urban & Schwarzenberg; 1993:197-230.
  20. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 1971;131:107-111.
  21. Cavity design and mathematics: their effect on gaps at the margins of cast restorations. Operative Dent 1985;10:137.
  22. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of titanium and gold-platinum-palladium metal ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:29-37.
  23. Crown margin and parodont [Kronenrand und Parodontium]. Dtsch Zahnaerztl Z 1989;44:737-742.
  24. Marginal fit of crowns and bridges [Zur marginalen Passform von Kronen und Brücken]. Dtsch Zahnaerztl Z 1986;41:1015-1019.
  25. A review of methods and techniques to improve the fit of cast restaurations. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56:279-283.
  26. Marginal fit of restorations before and after cementation. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:585-591.
  27. Quality control with the dental explorer? [Qualitätskontrolle mit der zahnärztlichen Sonde?]. Zahnaerztl Mitt 1990;80:2200.
  28. Marginal fit of crowns from foreign countries [Randschluss von Kronen aus dem Ausland]. Zahnaerztl Mitt 2001;91:44-46.
  29. Current theories of crown contour, margin placement, and pontic design. J Prosthet Dent 1981;45:268-273.
  30. Excessive crown contours facilitate endemic plaque niches. J Prosthet Dent 1976;35:424.
  31. Facial and lingual contours of artificial complete restorations and their effects on the periodontium. J Prosthet Dent 1973;29:61-66.
  32. In vivo marginal adaptation of cast crowns luted with different cements. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:25-32.
  33. Overhanging dental restorations and periodontal disease. J Periodont 1971;42:8-12.
  34. Histomorphometric study to qualify the marginal fit of cast crowns [Histologischmorphometrische Studie zur Bestimmung des zervikalen Randschlusses von Einzel- und Pfeilerkronen]. Z Stomatol 1987;84:53-73.
  35. Follow-up examinations of fixed restaurations [Nachuntersuchungen festsitzenden Ersatzes]. Dtsch Zahnaerztl Z 1971;26:716-724.
  36. Clinical and microbiological effects of subgingival restorations with overhanging or clinically perfect margins. J Clin Periodontol 1983;10:563-670.
  37. Reliability of measurments of the marginal crown gap [Verläßlichkeit von zirkulären Randspaltmessungen an Einzelkronen]. Dtsch Zahnaerztl Z 1998;53: 260-265.
  38. Comparison of different Methods for an in vivo evaluation of the marginal fit of crowns [Vergleich verschiedener Methoden zur Bestimmung der Randschlußgenauigkeit von Kronen in vivo]. Dtsch Zahnaerztl Z 1997;52:272-274.
  39. Comparison of methods of clinical evaluation of marginal fit of complete cast crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1985;54:20-24.
  40. Clinical and technical problems of a subgingival crown margin [Klinische und labortechnische Problematik subgingivaler Präparationsgrenzen]. Dtsch Zahnaerztl Z 1981;36:254-257.
  41. A standardized method for determination of crown margin fidelity. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:18.
  42. Tooth preparation for complete crowns: An art based on scientific principles. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:363-376.
  43. Effect of metal design and technique on the marginal characteristics of the collarless metal ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:611-619.
  44. Marginal distortion of thermally incompatible metal ceramic crowns with overextended margins. International Journal of Prosthodontics 1998;11:325-332.
  45. Marginal fit changes during porcelain firing cycles. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:49-54.
  46. Determination of the minimum number of marginal gap measurements required for practical in-vitro testing. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:40-49.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.