The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 7 , ISSUE 1 ( February, 2006 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Evaluation of the Smear Layer Removal Effectiveness of EDTA Using Two Techniques: An SEM Study

A. Cemal Tinaz, Tayfun Alaçam, L. Sibel Karadag, Tansev Mihçioğlu

Citation Information : Tinaz AC, Alaçam T, Karadag LS, Mihçioğlu T. Evaluation of the Smear Layer Removal Effectiveness of EDTA Using Two Techniques: An SEM Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006; 7 (1):9-16.

DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-7-1-9

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 01-02-2006

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2006; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Citation

Tinaz AC, Karadag LS, Alaçam T, Mihçioglu T. Evaluation of the Smear Layer Removal Effectiveness of EDTA Using Two Techniques: An SEM Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006 February;(7)1:009-016.


PDF Share
  1. Evaluation of smear layer removal by EDTAC and NaOCl with ultrasonic agitation. Int Endod J 2002;35:418-21.
  2. Canal debridement: Effectiveness of NaOCl and Ca(OH)2 as medicaments. J Endod 1996;22:521-25.
  3. A scanning electron microscope evaluation of root canal debridement with the endosonic ultrasonic synergistic system. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1982;53:527-31.
  4. Effectiveness and safety of a sonic vibratory endodontic instrument. Endod Dent Traumatol 1985;1:69-76.
  5. Histological evaluation of ultrasonic and sonic instrumentation of curved root canals. J Endod 1989;15:189-94.
  6. Ultrasonic compared with hand instrumentation: A Sem study. J Endod 1988;14:435-40.
  7. Effects of constraint on the oscillatory pattern of endodontic files. J Endod 1989;15:189-94.
  8. The effectiveness of Gly-Oxide and sodium hypochloride in preventing smear layer formation. J Endod 1985;11:281-8.
  9. In vivo and in vitro studies of the effect of the disodium salt of EDTA on human dentin and its endodontic implications. Oral Surg Med Pathol 1963;16:83-103.
  10. The smear layer: A phenomenon in root canal theraphy. Int Endod J 1995;28:141-48.
  11. The possible role of pH changes during EDTA demineralization of teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1989;68:220-22.
  12. The influence of the smear layer on the sealing ability of canal obturation. Int Endod J 1987;20:228-32.
  13. Smear removal agents: a quantitative study in vivo and in vitro. J Prosthet Dent 1987;25:174-79.
  14. Effectiveness of root canal irrigation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1977;44:306-12.
  15. Effects of rotary instruments and ultrasonics irrigation on debris and smear layer scores: A Sem study. Int Endod J 2002;35:582-89.
  16. Efficacy of several concentrations of sodium hypochlorite for root canal irrigation. J Endod 1992;18:605-12.
  17. A comparison of the cleaning efficacy of short term sonic and ultrasonic passive irrigation after hand instrumentation in molar root canals. J Endod 2003;29:674-78.
  18. Comparison of the cleaning efficacy of passive sonic activation and passive ultrasonic activation after hand instrumentation in molar root canals. J Endod 1999;25:735-38.
  19. Influence of passive ultrasonic activation on penetration depth of different sealers. J Contemp Dent Prac 2004:15:115-25.
  20. The demineralizing effects of EDTA at different concentrations and pH. J Endod 2002;28: 501-02.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.