The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 8 , ISSUE 6 ( September, 2007 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

The Influence of Temperature on the Efficacy of Polymerization of Composite Resin

Wedad Y. Awliya

Citation Information : Awliya WY. The Influence of Temperature on the Efficacy of Polymerization of Composite Resin. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007; 8 (6):9-16.

DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-8-6-9

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 01-09-2007

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2007; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of different temperatures on the efficacy of polymerization during the insertion of composite resin using different light curing units.

Methods and Materials

A total of 45 disc-shaped specimens were fabricated from Z250 composite resin (3M/ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) with 15 each prepared at three different temperatures (refrigerated to 5°C, room temperature at 25°C, and preheated to 37°C). Each of these temperature-controlled specimen groups of 15 were then subdivided into three groups of five specimens, according to the type of curing light used to polymerize them. Curing lights included a conventional halogen light (QTH) in two modes (continuous and softstart polymerization) and a light emitting diode (LED). The microhardness of the top and bottom surfaces of the specimens was determined using a Buehler Micromet II digital microhardness tester (Buehler, Dusseldorf, Germany). Data obtained was analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)/Post Hoc Tukey's test at a 0.05 significance level.

Results

As the temperature of composite resin increased, the top and bottom microhardness of the specimens also increased regardless of the type of polymerizing light used. The LED light produced a significantly better hardness on top and bottom surfaces of composite resin specimens polymerized at the three different temperatures. Effectiveness of cure at top and bottom surfaces of composite specimens was significantly reduced by using soft-start curing.

Conclusion

The use of pre-warmed composite resins might help to improve polymerization of composite resin especially at the deeper areas of a restoration which could result in an increase in the expected life of a composite restoration.

Citation

Awliya WY. The Influence of Temperature on the Efficacy of Polymerization of Composite Resin. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007 September; (8)6:009-016.


PDF Share
  1. Dental composite depth of cure with halogen and blue light emitting diode technology. Br Dent J 1999;186:388-391.
  2. A survey of efficiency of visible light curing units. J Dent 1998;26:239-243.
  3. Light curing technology: Past, Present, and Future. Compendium 2002;23(9):18-24.
  4. Light curing-An Update. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2002;23(10):889-892.
  5. Hardness evaluation of a dental composite polymerized with experimental LED-based devices. Dent Mater 2001;17:309-315.
  6. Influence of curing modes on crosslink density in polymer structures. J Dent 2004;32:321-326.
  7. influence of light energy density on effectiveness of composite cure. Oper Dent 2001;26:460-466.
  8. Composite cure and shrinkage associated with high intensity curing light. Oper Dent 2003;28:357-364.
  9. Reduction of polymerization contraction stress for dental composites by two-step light activation. Dent Mater 2002;18:436-444.
  10. Effect of irradiation type (LED or QTH) on photo-activated composite shrinkage strain kinetics, temperature rise, and hardness. Eur J Oral Sci 2002;110:471-479.
  11. Influence of light intensity on polymerization shrinkage and integrity of restoration-cavity interface, Eur J Oral Sci 1995;103:322-326.
  12. Reduced light energy decreases post-gel contraction while maintaining degree of conversion in composites. J Dent 1998;26:695-700.
  13. Effectiveness of composite cure with pulse activation and soft start polymerization. Oper Dent 2002;27:44-49.
  14. Restorative resins: hardness and strength vs. quantity of remaining double bonds. Scand J Dent Res 1982; 90:484-489.
  15. Correlation between degree of conversion, filler concentration and mechanical properties of posterior composite resins. J Oral Rehabil 1990;17:487-494.
  16. Correlation between hardness and degree of conversion during the setting reaction of unfilled dental restorative resins. Dent Mater 1985;1:11-14.
  17. Effect of cooled composite inserts in the sealing ability of resin composite restorations placed at intraoral temperatures: an in vitro study. Oper Dent 2003;28:297-302.
  18. Effect of refrigeration on shear bond strength of three dentine bonding systems. Am J Dent 1999;12:131-133.
  19. The influence of temperature on some physical properties of dental composite. J Oral Rehabil 1981;8:431-439.
  20. Influence of temperature and relative humidity on early bond strengths to dentin. J Dent 1995;23:41-45.
  21. Warming up composites. Compendium 2004;25:371-376.
  22. Seventh-generation adhesive system. Dent Today 2002;21:106-111.
  23. The effect of temperature on hardness of a light-curing composite. J Dent Res 2003;82 (Special issue A). Abstract 0119.
  24. Thermal effects on composite photopolymerization monitored by real-time NIR. J Dent Res 2003;82 (Special issue A). Abstract 0819.
  25. Composite film thickness at various temperatures. J Dent Res 2004;83 (Special issue A). Abstract 3265.
  26. Effectiveness of composite cure with pulse activation and soft start polymerization. Oper Dent 2002;27:44-49.
  27. Factors affecting the quantity of remaining double bonds in restorative resin polymers. Scan Dent J 1982;90:490-496
  28. Mechanical properties of dental materials in Philip's Science of Dental Materials 10th edition 1996. Philadelphia WB Saunders Co, p 69.
  29. A comparison of four modes of evaluating depth of cure of lightactivated composites. J Dent Res 1987;66:727-730.
  30. J Dent 1989;17:140-144.
  31. The effect of heat used as a secondary cure upon the physical properties of three composite resins II. Wear, hardness and color stability. Quintessence Int 1987;18:351-356.
  32. The curing potential of light-activated composite resin luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:512-518.
  33. Conversion in different depth of ultraviolet and visible light activated composite materials. Acta Odontol Scand 1982;40:179-192.
  34. Effect of the increase of energy density on knoop hardness of dental composites light-cured by conventional QTH, LED and xenon plasma arc. Braz Dent J 2005;16(3):218-24.
  35. Evaluation of curing performance of light-emitting polymerization units. Gen Dent 2006;54:17-20.
  36. LED and halogen lights: effect of ceramic thickness and shade on curing luting resin. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2003;24:497-500.
  37. Light curing units, polymerization and clinical implications. J Adhes Dent 2000;2:167-173.
  38. Pulp response to externally applied heat. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1965; 19:515-530.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.