The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 8 , ISSUE 7 ( November, 2007 ) > List of Articles


Anticaries Potential of Commercial Dentifrices as Determined by Fluoridation and Remineralization Efficiency

Elias Casals, Tchilalo Boukpessi, Christina M. McQueen, Sandy L. Eversole, Robert V. Faller

Citation Information : Casals E, Boukpessi T, McQueen CM, Eversole SL, Faller RV. Anticaries Potential of Commercial Dentifrices as Determined by Fluoridation and Remineralization Efficiency. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007; 8 (7):1-10.

DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-8-7-1

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 01-01-2009

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2007; The Author(s).



The aim of this in vitro study was to investigate fluoride uptake in human enamel after use of commercially available toothpastes containing different fluoride compounds, or combinations of fluoride actives formulated into a single product, as a means of determining the efficiency of each formula for delivering caries preventing fluoride to demineralized (caries active) enamel.

Methods and Materials

Four test dentifrices and two controls were assessed and placed in groups as follows: Group 1: Lacer® (Spain); Group 2: Positive control-USP Reference Standard 1100 ppm F; Group 3: Fluocaril® Bi-Fluoré 250 (France); Group 4: Colgate Fluor Active (Denmark); Group 5: Elmex® (France); and Group 6: A placebo (formulated the same as the USP Reference Standard toothpaste with the exception that it contained < 1 ppm F). Cores 3 mm in diameter were removed from erupted human enamel specimens (extracted by local oral surgeons for orthodontic reasons) and stored in 1% Thymol solution prior to use. They were ground and polished to remove the natural fluoride rich enamel layer, then exposed to a demineralization solution, and assessed for surface microhardness to enable randomization for use in the study. Each group of five specimens underwent a daily pH cycling procedure that involved exposure to pooled human saliva (refreshed three times daily). The groups were then exposed to dentifrice slurries four times daily for one minute per exposure and to a demineralization solution for three hours. The cycling procedure was repeated for five days. Specimens were again analyzed for surface microhardness and fluoride uptake upon completion of five days of treatment.


Average surface hardness: Groups 2 and 3 showed a statistically significant greater (p<0.05) change indicating greater remineralization compared to all other groups. The average change was 23.45 for Group 2 and 22.65 for Group 3. All other groups had changes ranging from 4.25-8.62. No other statistically significant differences were observed between groups. Fluoride uptake results: Groups 2 and 3 showed statistically significantly greater fluoride uptake versus all other groups (p <0.05). Groups 1 and 5 were significantly different from Group 6. No other statistically significant differences were observed for either analysis.


Of the marketed products included in the study, the Fluocaril® Bi-Fluoré 250 product formulation provided both the highest level of fluoride uptake and mineralization to the demineralized enamel. The clinical significance of these in vitro results is the confirmation Fluocaril® Bi-Fluoré 250 is effective at remineralizing enamel caries lesions.


Casals E, Boukpessi T, McQueen CM, Eversole SL, Faller RV. Anticaries Potential of Commercial Dentifrices as Determined by Fluoridation and Remineralization Efficiency. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007 November; (8)7:001-010.

PDF Share
  1. Fluoride in Preventive Dentistry. Chicago, Ill: Quintessence Publishing Co;1983.
  2. Clinical Uses of Fluorides: A State of the Art Conference on the Uses of Fluoride in Clinical Dentistry. Philadelphia, Pa: Lea and Febiger; 1985.
  3. Fluoride dentifrices: current status and prospects. Int Dent J. 1991; 41:9-16.
  4. Fluoride containing toothpastes, their clinical effect and mechanism of cariostatic action: a review. International Dent J. 1991;41: 171-174.
  5. Changes in the prevalence of dental caries in US schoolchildren. 1961-1980. J Dent Res 1982; 61:1346-1351.
  6. Recent changes in dental caries. Br Med J 1985; 291:1287-1298.
  7. Dentifrices: Recent clinical findings and implications for use. Int Dent J. 1993; 43:549-553.
  8. Reduction in dental caries with four concentrations of sodium fluoride in a dentifrice: A meta analysis evaluation. J Clin Dent 2001; 12:57-62.
  9. A critical review of the relative anticaries efficacy of sodium fluoride and sodium monofluorophosphate dentifrice. Caries Res 1993; 27:337-360.
  10. Role of fluoride toothpastes in a caries preventive strategy. Caries Res 1993; 27 (Suppl 1) 23-28.
  11. Fluoride in deciduous teeth from an anti-caries clinical study. J Dent Res 1984 63:1201-1205.
  12. Changes in dental caries 1953-2003. Caries Res 2004; 38:173-181.
  13. Influence of fluoride on tooth demineralization. I. Chemical Data. Caries Res 1983; 7:193-199.
  14. Prevention and reversal of dental caries: role of low level fluoride. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1999; 27:31-40.
  15. The application of in vitro models to research on demineralization and remineralization of the teeth. Adv Dent Res 1995 9(3): 175-193.
  16. Reactivity of fluoride dentifrices with artificial caries. I. Effects on early carious lesions: Fluoride uptake, surface hardening and remineralization. Caries Res 1987 21:126-140.
  17. Nature and role of loosely bound fluoride in dental caries. J Dent Res 1990; 69, 601-5.
  18. Fluoride in the oral environment. Acta Odontol Scand 1999; 57:330-333.
  19. A 3-year oral health dose response study of sodium monofluorophosphate dentifrices with and without zinc citrate: anticaries results. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1988; 16:321-325.
  20. An abbreviated caries clinical trial design validated over 24 months. J Dent Res 2002; 81:637-640.
  21. Am J Dent 2003;16:99-104.
  22. In vitro fluoride uptake in demineralized enamel after use of various toothpastes. Quintessenz 1997; June.
  23. The comparative anticaries efficacy of Crest toothpaste relative to some marketed Chinese toothpastes – results of in vitro pH cycling testing. Int Dent J 1997; 47:313-320.
  24. Fluoride uptake from anticalculus dentifrices in vitro. Caries Res 1987; 21(1); 40-46.
  25. Fluoride release in childrens’ toothpastes. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 1993; 103(6):727-31.
  26. Fluoride release from toothpastes in the newly produced and stored states. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 1995;105; 461-466.
  27. Enamel fluoride uptake affected by site of application: comparing sodium and amine fluorides. Caries Res 1990; 24(1)11-17.
  28. Salivary effects on in vitro activity of sodium fluoride (NaF) and amine fluoride (AmF) dentifrices. Caries Res 1991; 25(3): Abst #66.
  29. Comparison between evaluation methods for the anticaries efficacy of monofluorophosphate containing dentifrices. Caries Res 1991; 25:130-137.
  30. The effect of pH upon fluoride uptake in intact enamel. Scand J Dent Res 1975; 83:339-344.
  31. Fluoride uptake from an anti-calculus NaF dentifrice in vitro. Caries Res 1986;20:332-336.
  32. Reduced clinical effect of monofluorophosphate in the presence of sodium lauryl sulphate. Caries Res 1983 17:549-553.
  33. Surface microhardness changes, enamel fluoride uptake, and fluoride availability from commercial toothpastes. J Clin Dent 2006;17 [Spec Iss]:94-99.
  34. Use of synthetic polymer gels for artificial carious lesion preparation. Caries Res 1987;21(3):228-42.
  35. Electron probe microanalysis and transverse microradiography studies of artificial lesions in enamel and dentin: a comparative study. Adv Dent Res 1997; 11(4):426-432.
  36. Effect of topical fluoride treatments on fluoride distribution during in vitro caries-like lesion formation. Caries Res 1988; 22(5);263-8.
  37. An in vivo investigation of the fluoride uptake in partially demineralized human enamel from several different dentifrices. J Dent Res 1985; 64:19-23.
  38. Fluoride taken up by plaque, by the underlying enamel and by clean enamel from three fluoride compounds. Caries Res 1982;16:156-161.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.