The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 9 , ISSUE 3 ( March, 2008 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Increase in Utilization of Dental Sealants

Anty Lam

Citation Information : Lam A. Increase in Utilization of Dental Sealants. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008; 9 (3):81-87.

DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-9-3-81

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 01-09-2009

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2008; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim

The purpose of this review is to explore how to increase utilization of dental sealants to reach the national 50% sealant objective as stated in the Healthy People 2010 document.

Background

Dental decay is the most common chronic childhood disease. A simple, cost-effective preventive measure to manage this disease is through sealant application.

Review

Although dental sealants are effective in reducing the risk of having dental decay, their rate of utilization among children and adolescents is below the objective set forth by the Healthy People 2010 document. This is related to the lack of public awareness, patient education, and inadequate reimbursement for sealants served by third-party insurers.

Conclusion

Dental decay is the most common chronic childhood disease. Dental sealants are a simple, costeffective preventive measure to manage this disease. In order to meet the national 50% sealant objective of the Healthy People 2010 document, public awareness and the education of consumers about the benefit of having dental sealants must be improved. Third-party insurers must improve the benefits for subscribers seeking dental sealant services. Using these approaches, the utilization of dental sealants will improve the oral health among the next generation of Americans.

Citation

Lam A. Increase in Utilization of Dental Sealants. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008 March; (9)3:081-087.


PDF Share
  1. Pit-and-fissure sealants. In: Harris NO, Garcia-Godoy F. Primary Preventive Dentistry. 6th ed. New Jersey: Pearson-Prentice Hall; 2004. p.285-318.
  2. NIH Consens Dev Conf Consens Statement 1983 December 5-7;4(11).
  3. NIH Consensus Statement Online 2001 March 26-28; [2006,4,20];18(1):1-24
  4. ADA Council on Access, Prevention and Interprofessional Relations; ADA Council on Scientific Affairs. J Am Dent Assoc. 1997 Apr;128(4):485-8.
  5. Pit and fissure sealants for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004, Issue 3. Art No.: CD001830 DOI: 10.1002 / 14651858. CD001830. pub 2.
  6. Sealants recommended to prevent caries. Evid Based Dent. 2004; 5(4):93-4.
  7. Sealants revisited: an update of the effectiveness of pit-and-fissure sealants. Caries Res. 1993;27 suppl 1:77-82.
  8. A comparative study of two pit and fissure sealants: results after 4½ years in Augusta, Ga. J Am Dent Assoc. 1981 Aug;103(2):235-8.
  9. Current status of sealant retention and caries prevention. J Dent Educ. 1984; 48:18-26.
  10. The role of sealants in caries prevention programs. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2003 Mar; 31(3):221-7.
  11. Chemically polymerized sealant in preventing occlusal caries. J Canad Dent Assoc. 1980; 4:259-60.
  12. The effectiveness of a chemically polymerized sealant: fouryear sealants. Pediatr Dent. 1980; 2(1):24-6.
  13. On the retention and effectiveness of fissure sealant in permanent molars after 15-20 years: a cohort study. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2001 Aug; 29(4):302-7.
  14. The effect of bonding agents on the microleakage and bond strength of sealant in primary teeth. J Oral Rehabil. 1999 May; 26(5):436-41.
  15. Improved sealant retention with bonding agents: a clinical study of two-bottle and single-bottle systems. J Dent Res. 2000 Nov; 79(11):1850-6.
  16. Use of one-bottle adhesive as an intermediate bonding layer to reduce sealant microleakage on saliva-contaminated enamel. Am J Dent. 2000 Aug; 13(4):187-91.
  17. One year clinical evaluation of the retention and quality of two fluoride releasing sealants. Clin Oral Investig. 1999 Dec;3(4):188-93.
  18. S. Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS). Oral Health in America: A Report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, 2000.
  19. 2-year clinical performance of a fluoride-containing fissure sealant in young school children at caries risk. Am J Dent. 1997 Jun; 10(3):115-9.
  20. J Am Dent Assoc. 2005;136 (9):1265-72.
  21. A Review of the Literature: The Economic Impact of Preventive Dental Hygiene Services. J Dent Hyg. 2005; 79(1):11-1.
  22. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2005 Aug 26;54(3):1-43.
  23. J Public Health Dent. 1996 Winter; 56(1):12-21.
  24. MMWR Morb Mor Rep 2000;Aug 31; 50:736-8.
  25. Sealant Saturdays: preventive care aims to keep kids smiling. Desert News, Salt Lake City, Utah. 2000 Mar 19.
  26. [updated 2004 Oct 06; cited 2006 Apr 20].
  27. [updated 2005 Sept 27; cited 2006 Apr 20].
  28. [updated: 2005 May 19; cited 2006 Apr 20].
  29. [cited 2006 Apr 20].
  30. [cited 2006 Apr 20].
  31. Dental sealants. Who needs them? Public Health Rep. 1997 Mar-Apr;112(2):98-106; discussion 107
  32. The Importance of Cultural Sensitivity in Providing Oral Care and Professional Services. ACCESS. 2005;12:10-5.
  33. Utilization of dental sealants by Alabama Medicaid children: barriers in meeting the 2010 objectives. Pediatr Dent. 2001 Sep-Oct; 23(5):401-6.
  34. Conservative treatment of the Class I lesion. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004;135(6):760-4.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.