The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 9 , ISSUE 7 ( November, 2008 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Impact of a Novel Power Toothbrush with SmartGuide Technology on Brushing Pressure and Thoroughness

Robert D. Bartizek, Patricia A. Walters, Karen Janusz, Bruce Nelson, Aaron Biesbrock

Citation Information : Bartizek RD, Walters PA, Janusz K, Nelson B, Biesbrock A. Impact of a Novel Power Toothbrush with SmartGuide Technology on Brushing Pressure and Thoroughness. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008; 9 (7):1-8.

DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-9-7-1

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 00-11-2008

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2008; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

Toothbrushing effectiveness can be improved with at-home reinforcement of proper technique. This study evaluated the ability of a power brush with a wireless remote display (Oral-B® Triumph® with SmartGuide™) to improve brushing force and thoroughness.

Methods and Materials

At baseline, 61 pre-screened subjects were videotaped while brushing. The wireless display was also videotaped. Subjects were then randomized to the power brush alone or the power brush with the wireless display. After 30 days of home use, subjects returned and brushed for two minutes using a two-way mirror. Brushing behavior and the wireless display were videotaped.

Results

Fifty-eight subjects were included in the pressure sensor analysis. The reduction in pressure sensor activation time at day 30 versus baseline was 88.5% for the power brush with wireless display and 53.4% for the power brush alone. The difference between groups was statistically significant in favor of the power brush with display (p=0.034). Forty-six subjects were included in the brushing thoroughness assessment. Subjects using the power brush with the wireless display showed statistically significantly more thorough brushing across the dentition and lingual/buccal surfaces relative to baseline. The power brush alone did not show a significant difference relative to baseline.

Conclusion

Subjects using the power brush with the wireless display brushed with less force than subjects using the power brush alone after 30 days of home use.

Clinical Significance

The power brush with the wireless display can be incorporated in patients’ home care routine to improve brushing technique, including brushing pressure and thoroughness.

Citation

Janusz K, Nelson B, Bartizek RD, Walters PA, Biesbrock A. Impact of a Novel Power Toothbrush with SmartGuide Technology on Brushing Pressure and Thoroughness. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008 November; (9)7:001-008.


PDF Share
  1. Experimental gingivitis in man. J Periodontol. 1965; 36:177-187.
  2. Conversion of stable established gingivitis in the dog into destructive periodontitis. Arch Oral Biol. 1975; 20:775-782.
  3. Conversion of a stable T-cell lesion into a progressive B-cell lesion in the pathogenesis of chronic inflammatory periodontal disease: An hypothesis. J Clin Periodontol. 1979; 6:267-277.
  4. Mechanical oral hygiene practices. State of the science review. In: Loe, H., Kleinman, D.V. Dental plaque control measures and oral hygiene practices. Proceedings from a state of the science workshop. Oxford:IRL Press Ltd;1986:93-116.
  5. Current patterns of oral hygiene product use and practices. Periodontology 2000. 1995; 8:11-14.
  6. New studies on estimated and actual toothbrushing times and dentifrice use. J Clin Dent. 1998; 9:49-51.
  7. A clinical evaluation of a novel data logger to determine compliance with the use of powered toothbrushes. J Clin Periodontol. 2002; 29:838-843.
  8. Development and laboratory evaluation of a new toothbrush with a novel brush head design. Am J Dent. 2000;13(Special Issue):5A-14.
  9. J Clin Periodontol. 2005; 32:158-162.
  10. The prevalence and distribution of gingival recession in subjects with a high standard of oral hygiene. J Clin Periodontol. 1994; 21:57-63.
  11. High and low brushing force in relation to efficacy and gingival abrasion. J Clin Periodontol. 2004; 31:620-624.
  12. The effect of oral care feedback devices on plaque removal and attitudes towards oral care. Int Dent J. 2003;53.(Suppl 1): 404-408.
  13. Effect of instruction and motivation in the use of electric and manual toothbrushes in periodontal patients. A comparative study. Braz Oral Res. 2004; 18:296-300.
  14. The effect of different dental health programs on young adult individuals. A longitudinal evaluation of knowledge and behavior including cost aspects. Sw Dent J. 2003; 27:115-130.
  15. The Impact of Behavioral Technology on Dental Caries. J Dent Educ. 2001; 65:1102-1105
  16. The retention of newly-acquired brushing and flossing skills. J Clin Periodontol. 1989; 16:331-332.
  17. A novel oscillating-rotating power toothbrush with SmartGuide: Designed for enhanced performance and compliance. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007; 8:1-9
  18. In: Statistical methodology in the pharmaceutical sciences. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1990:423-426.
  19. Manual versus powered toothbrushing for oral health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;(2):CD002281. Review.
  20. Manual versus powered toothbrushing for oral health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003; (1):CD002281. Review
  21. Toothbrushing force in relation to plaque removal. J Clin Periodontol. 1996; 23:724-729.
  22. Toothbrushing behavior in relation to plaque and gingivitis in adolescent schoolchildren. J Periodontol Res. 1979; 14:231-238.
  23. Uninstructed toothbrushing behaviour in young adults in relation to cigarette smoking in Newcastle. Com Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1984; 12:358-360.
  24. Toothbrushing duration in 60 uninstructed young adults. Com Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1985; 13:121-122.
  25. , Rugg-Gunn AJ, Gordon PH. Plaque levels in relation to the number of toothbrushing strokes in uninstructed English schoolchildren. J Periodontol Res. 1986; 21:577-582.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.