The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 10 , ISSUE 3 ( May, 2009 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

The Effect of Different Adhesive Types and Curing Methods on Microleakage and the Marginal Adaptation of Composite Veneers

Horieh Moosavi, Fathemeh Maleknejad, Nasrin Sarabi, Resa Shahriari, Taybeh Shayankhah

Citation Information : Moosavi H, Maleknejad F, Sarabi N, Shahriari R, Shayankhah T. The Effect of Different Adhesive Types and Curing Methods on Microleakage and the Marginal Adaptation of Composite Veneers. J Contemp Dent Pract 2009; 10 (3):18-26.

DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-10-3-18

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 01-05-2009

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2009; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of application techniques (with pre-curing vs without pre-curing) for dentin adhesive on microleakage and marginal adaptation of indirect composite veneer restorations.

Methods and Materials

A total-etch bonding system, Excite/Variolink II (EXV), and a self-etching primer system, Panavia F2.0 (PF2), were used in the study. Forty-eight human central incisors were prepared for composite veneer restorations. The teeth were divided into two groups (n=24). For each resin cement, one half of each experimental group included an adhesive pre-cure (PC) with a halogen light source while the other half received no pre-cure (NPC) prior to resin cement insertion. Thus, four experimental groups were created: A (PC+EXV), B (NPC+EXV), C (PC+PF2), and D (NPC+PF2). Veneers made of Tetric Ceram resin composite were cemented using dual-cured resin luting agents. After storage in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours, the teeth were prepared for marginal leakage. Two samples of each group were selected at random for scanning electron microscopic (SEM) observation and evaluation of marginal adaptation at 1050x magnification. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests (Ð <0.05).

Results

The highest and lowest microleakage values were observed in dentinal margins of groups B and A, respectively. Dentin margins opposite to enamel margins had a significant difference in microleakage values of PC and NPC groups (P<0.05). The influence of the adhesive pre-cure was more pronounced than the type of resin cement used. No adhesive layer was visualized for the adhesives used without employing the pre-curing step.

Conclusion

The effect of pre-cured adhesives was not material specific. The pre-cured adhesives showed the best resistance to dye penetration although the film thickness of these luting agents was only slightly increased.

Clinical Significance

Different curing methods (with pre-curing/without pre-curing) regardless of total-etch or self-etch adhesive systems influenced microleakage and the marginal adaptation, especially dentin margins of indirect composite veneers.

Citation

Maleknejad F, Moosavi H, Shahriari R, Sarabi S, Shayankhah T. The Effect of Different Adhesive Types and Curing Methods on Microleakage and the Marginal Adaptation of Composite Veneers. J Contemp Dent Pract 2009 May; (10)3:018-026.


PDF Share
  1. Dental luting agents: a review of the current literature. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:280–301.
  2. Porcelain veneers bonded to tooth structure: an ultramorphological FE-SEM examination of the adhesive interface. Dent Mater 1999;15:105–19.
  3. Porcelain veneers: a review of the literature. J Dent 2000;28:163–77.
  4. Clinical and scanning electron microscopic assessments of porcelain and ceromer resin veneers. Indian J Dent Res 2003; 14:264-78.
  5. Surface treatment protocols in the cementation process of ceramic and laboratory-processed composite restorations: a literature review. J Esthet Restor Dent 2005; 17:224-35.
  6. Recent developments in dentin bonding. Am J Dent 2000; 13:44-50.
  7. Measurement of enamel thickness in relation to reduction for etched laminate veneers. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1992;12:407–13.
  8. Microleakage of adhesive restorative materials. Am J Dent 2001;14:170–76.
  9. Detection of microleakage around dental restorations: a review. Oper Dent 1997;22:173–85.
  10. Histopathological response of infected cavities treated with Gluma and Scotchbond dentin bonding agents. Am J Dent 1998;1:189–94.
  11. A microleakage study of ceramic laminate veneers by autoradiography: effect of incisal edge preparation. J Oral Rehabil 2004; 31:265-70.
  12. Microleakage of porcelain veneer restorations bonded to enamel and dentin with a new self-adhesive resin-based dental cement. Dent Mater 2007; 23:218-25.
  13. Composite resin contraction gaps measured with a fluorescent resin technique. Dent Mater 1988; 4:238-45.
  14. Marginal integrity of ceramic inlays luted with a self–curing resin system. Dent Mater 2003; 19:270-6.
  15. Marginal accuracy of CAD/CAM inlays made with the original and the updated software. J Dent 1992;20:171–7.
  16. Marginal fit of porcelain-fused-to-metal and two types of ceramic crown. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 63:26-31.
  17. The effect of curing light intensity on the cytotoxicity of a dentin-bonding agent. Oper Dent 2001; 26:505-10.
  18. Increased wall-to-wall curing contraction in thin bonded resin layers. J Dent Res 1989; 68:48-50.
  19. Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 1990; 69:1240-3.
  20. Function of the hybrid zone as a stress-absorbing layer in resin-dentin bonding. Quintessence Int 1995; 26:733-8.
  21. Polymerization contraction stress in thin resin composite layers as a function of layer thickness. Dent Mater 1997; 13:146-50.
  22. Immediate dentin sealing of onlay preparations: Thickness of pre-cured dentin bonding agent and effect of surface cleaning. Oper Dent 2005; 30:747-57.
  23. Marginal adaptation of dentin bonded ceramic inlays: effects of bonding systems and luting resin composites. Oper Dent 2003; 28:574-58.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.