The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 10 , ISSUE 6 ( November, 2009 ) > List of Articles


Effect of Postoperative Bleaching on Marginal Leakage of Resin Composite and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Restorations at Different Delayed Periods of Exposure to Carbamide Peroxide

Horieh Moosavi, Marjaneh Ghavamnasiri, Vahideh Manari

Citation Information : Moosavi H, Ghavamnasiri M, Manari V. Effect of Postoperative Bleaching on Marginal Leakage of Resin Composite and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Restorations at Different Delayed Periods of Exposure to Carbamide Peroxide. J Contemp Dent Pract 2009; 10 (6):1-8.

DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-10-6-1

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 01-12-2014

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2009; The Author(s).



To evaluate the effect of dental bleaching with carbamide peroxide at different exposure times on the microleakage of resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer restorations after placement in extracted human teeth.

Methods and Materials

120 Class V cavity preparations were placed at the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) of human teeth. Half of the cavities were restored with Filtek P60 resin composite(C) and the other half were restored with Fuji II LC resin-modified glass ionomer (G). Each group was randomly divided into four subgroups (n=15). Groups C1 and G1 were not bleached and stored in artificial saliva at 37°C to serve as control groups, while in Groups C2 and G2, C3 and G3, and C4 and G4 specimens were exposed to a 15% carbamide peroxide gel for one day, one week, and two weeks, respectively, following the placement of restorations. Microleakage was assessed using the dye penetration method. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon tests (p=0.05).


The Kruskal-Wallis test showed no significant difference among all groups of composite or glass ionomer restorations with either enamel or dentinal margins with regard to microleakage (p>0.05). The Wilcoxon test revealed more marginal leakage in the enamel/ glass ionomer margins than the enamel/ composite margins (p<0.05). In comparisons within each group, the Wilcoxon test showed there was more microleakage in dentinal margins of composite restorations than in the enamel margins in the test groups (p<0.05). The dentinal margins of the glass ionomer in control groups showed more leakage than the enamel margins, but after the bleaching procedure all experimental groups showed statistically similar microleakage in both the enamel and dentinal margins (p>0.05).


Postoperative bleaching with carbamide peroxide could increase microleakage in the dentinal margins of composite and the enamel margins of resin-modified glass ionomer restorations.

Clinical Significance

Rebonding of resin composite restorations should be considered following bleaching with 15% carbamide peroxide in order to reseal the margins. Resin-modified glass ionomer is not suitable as a filling material before bleaching because of its susceptibility to increased microleakage.


Moosavi H, Ghavamnasiri M, Manari V. Effect of Postoperative Bleaching on Marginal Leakage of Resin Composite and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Restorations at Different Delayed Periods of Exposure to Carbamide Peroxide. J Contemp Dent Pract [Internet]. 2009 Nov; 10(6):009-016. Available from: http://www.thejcdp. com/journal/view/volume10-issue6-moosavi.

PDF Share
  1. Effect of three bleaching agents on the surface properties of three different esthetic restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 89(5):466-73.
  2. Tooth bleaching—a critical review of the biological aspects. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2003; 14(4):292-304.
  3. The effect of four bleaching agents on the enamel surface: A scanning electron microscopic study. Quintessence Int. 1993; 24:817-24.
  4. Influence of different bleaching systems on fracture toughness and hardness of enamel. Oper Dent. 2004; 29(2):188-95.
  5. Susceptibility of enamel surfaces to demineralization after application of fluoridated carbamide peroxide gels. Caries Res. 2003; 37(2):93-9.
  6. Effect of different time periods of vital bleaching on flexural strength of the bovine enamel and dentin complex. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007; 8(3):21-8.
  7. The effect of bleaching agents on the microhardness of dental aesthetic restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil. 2002; 29(7):657-61.
  8. Higher-concentration carbamide peroxide effects on surface roughness of composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2002; 14(2):92-6.
  9. The effect of 16 percent carbamide peroxide on enamel staining susceptibility. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2006; 34(11):873-6.
  10. Effects of bleaching with carbamide peroxide gels on microhardness of restoration materials. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2003; 15(3):175-82.
  11. Effect of bleaching on restorative materials and restorations—a systematic review. Dent Mater. 2004; 20(9):852-61.
  12. Effect of pre- and post-operative bleaching on marginal leakage of amalgam and composite restorations. Quintessence Int. 2003;34(7):505-8.
  13. Postoperative dental bleaching: effect of microleakage on Class V tooth colored restorative materials. J Tenn Dent Assoc. 1998; 78(4):36-40.
  14. Post-operative bleaching: effect on microleakage. Am J Dent. 1992; 5(2):109-12.
  15. Effect of bleaching treatments on microleakage of Class I restorations. J Clin Dent. 2008; 19(1):33-6.
  16. Effect of bleaching gels on the surface roughness, hardness, and micromorphology of composites. Gen Dent. 2002; 50(3):247-50.
  17. Effects of in-office tooth whiteners on hardness of tooth-colored restoratives. Oper Dent. 2002; 27(2):137-41.
  18. Influence of carbamide peroxide-based bleaching agents on the bond strength of resinenamel/ dentin interfaces. Braz Oral Res. 2005; 19(1):23-9.
  19. Systematic reviews: I. The correlation between laboratory tests on marginal quality and bond strength. II. The correlation between marginal quality and clinical outcome. J Adhes Dent. 2007;9 Suppl 1: 77-106.
  20. [Evaluation of pH variation and cervical dentin permeability in teeth submitted to bleaching treatment]. Pesqui Odontol Bras. 2002; 16(3):263-8.
  21. The effect of current-generation bonding systems on microleakage of resin composite restorations. Quintessence Int. 2002; 33(10):763-9.
  22. Effect of single step adhesives on the marginal permeability of Class V resin composites. Oper Dent. 2007; 32(1):67-72.
  23. Effect of insertion technique and adhesive system on microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations. J Adhes Dent. 2005; 7(4):303-8.
  24. Effect of centripetal and incremental methods in Class II composite resin restorations on gingival microleakage. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007; 8(2):113-20.
  25. Initial in-vivo evaluation of glass-ionomer cements for use as alveolar bone substitutes. Clin Mater. 1991; 7(4):295-300.
  26. Effect of peroxide bleaches on fluoride release of dental materials. Am J Dent. 1997; 10(6):264-7.
  27. Microleakage at gingival margins of Class V composite resin restorations rebonded with various lowviscosity resin systems. Quintessence Int. 1991; 22(7):565-73.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.