The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Volume  25 (2024)
Volume  24 (2023)
Volume  23 (2022)
Volume  22 (2021)
Volume  21 (2020)
Volume  20 (2019)
Volume  19 (2018)
Volume  18 (2017)
Volume  17 (2016)
Volume  16 (2015)
Volume  15 (2014)
Volume  14 (2013)
Volume  13 (2012)
Volume  12 (2011)
Volume  11 (2010)
Volume  10 (2009)
Volume  9 (2008)
Volume  8 (2007)
Volume  7 (2006)
Volume  6 (2005)
Volume  5 (2004)
Volume  4 (2003)
Volume  3 (2002)
Volume  2 (2001)
Volume  1 (1999)
Related articles

VOLUME 10 , ISSUE 6 ( November, 2009 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Adhesive Bond Strengths Using Self- and Light-Cured Composites

Ricardo Walter, Georgia V. Macedo, Gustavo M. S. Oliveira, Edward J. Swift

Citation Information : Walter R, Macedo GV, Oliveira GM, Swift EJ. Adhesive Bond Strengths Using Self- and Light-Cured Composites. J Contemp Dent Pract 2009; 10 (6):25-32.

DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-10-6-25

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 01-03-2015

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2009; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim

To evaluate the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of four adhesive systems to dentin, using self- and light-cured resin composites.

Methods and Materials

Crowns of human molars were separated from the roots, and the occlusal surfaces were ground to obtain flat superficial dentin. Three etch-and-rinse adhesives—All-Bond 2, One-Step Plus, and OptiBond Solo Plus—and one self-etching primer system, Peak SE, were evaluated. Each adhesive group was divided into two subgroups according to the type of resin composite used. A self-cured (Bisfil 2B) or light-cured (Filtek Supreme Plus) resin composite build-up was incrementally inserted to the dentin after each adhesive system was applied. The bonded specimens were stored in water for 24 h and sectioned into beams. Microtensile testing was done, and the data were subjected to ANOVA and Fisher's PLSD test.

Results

The μTBS of All-Bond 2 and One- Step Plus was not affected by the type of resin composite used (p=0.3131 and p=0.1562, respectively). The μTBS of OptiBond Solo Plus was significantly reduced when used with selfcured resin composite (p<0.0001). Peak SE formed no bond of self-cured resin composite to dentin.

Conclusions

Some adhesives do not effectively bond self-cured resin composite to dentin.

Clinical Significance

Incompatibility between adhesives with low pH and certain self-cured resin composites can cause clinical debonding of restorations.

Citation

Walter R, Macedo GV, Oliveira GMS, Swift Jr EJ. Adhesive Bond Strengths Using Self- and Light-Cured Composites. J Contemp Dent Pract [Internet]. 2009 Nov; 10(6):025-032. Available from: http://www.thejcdp.com/journal/ view/volume10-issue6-walter.

PDF Share
  1. Non-pressure adhesion of a new adhesive restorative resin. J Dent Res. 1979; 58(4):1364-70.
  2. Adhesion of resin composite core materials to dentin. Int J Prosthodont. 2001; 14(5):451-6.
  3. Adverse surface interactions between one-bottle light-cured adhesives and chemical-cured composites. Dent Mater. 2001; 17(6):542-56.
  4. Effects of restorative and adhesive curing methods on dentin bond strengths. Am J Dent. 2001; 14(3):137-40.
  5. Incompatibility of self-etch adhesives with chemical/dual-cured composites: two-step vs one-step systems. Oper Dent. 2003; 28(6):747-55.
  6. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and chemically-cured or dual-cured composites. Part I. Single-step self-etching adhesive. J Adhes Dent. 2003; 5(1):27-40.
  7. Short- and longterm bonding efficacy of a self-etching, onestep adhesive. J Adhes Dent. 2003; 5(1):41-5.
  8. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and self-cured or dual-cured composites. Part II. Single-bottle, total-etch adhesive. J Adhes Dent. 2003:5(2):91-105.
  9. Influence of pH of different adhesive systems on the polymerization of a chemically cured composite resin. Braz Dent J. 2005; 16(2):107-11.
  10. Conversion of one-step to twostep self-etch adhesives for improved efficacy and extended application. Am J Dent. 2005; 18(2):126-34.
  11. Dentin bonding of light- and self-curing resin composites using simplified total- and self-etch adhesives. Quintessence Int. 2007; 38(1):e27-35.
  12. Threeyear clinical effectiveness of four total-etch dentinal adhesive systems in cervical lesions. Quintessence Int. 1996; 27(11):775-84.
  13. A randomized, controlled trial evaluating the three-year clinical effectiveness of two etch & rinse adhesives in cervical lesions. Oper Dent. 2004; 29(4):376-85.
  14. Clinical evaluation of an all-in-one adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions with different degrees of dentin sclerosis. Oper Dent. 2008; 33(4):370-8.
  15. Shear bond strengths of one-bottle dentin adhesives using multiple applications. Oper Dent. 1997; 22(5):194-9.
  16. Mechanical disruption of dentin collagen fibrils during resin-dentin bond testing. J Adhes Dent. 2000; 2(3):175-92.
  17. The in vitro dentin bond strengths of two adhesive systems in class I cavities of human molars. J Adhes Dent. 2002; 4(1):31-9.
  18. Effect of cavity configuration and aging on the bonding effectiveness of six adhesives to dentin. Dent Mater. 2005; 21(2):110-24.
  19. Incompatibility of oxalate desensitizers with acidic, fluoridecontaining total-etch adhesives. J Dent Res. 2005; 84(8):730-5.
  20. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials. 2007; 28(26):3757-85.
  21. Regional measurement of resin-dentin bonding as an array. J Dent Res. 1999; 78(2):699-705.
  22. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength— evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test. Dent Mater. 1994; 10(4):236-40.
  23. Microtensile bond strength testing and failure analysis of two dentin adhesives. Dent Mater. 1998; 14(1):44-50.
  24. Effect of light-cure time of adhesive resin on the thickness of the oxygeninhibited layer and the microtensile bond strength to dentin. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2006; 78(1):115-23.
  25. Importance of the hybrid layer on the bond strength of restorations subjected to cyclic loading. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2008; 84(1):291-7.
  26. Effect of curing mode on microtensile bond strength to dentin of two dual-cured adhesive systems in combination with resin luting cements for indirect restorations. Oper Dent. 2007; 32(1):37-44.
  27. Restorations with extensive dentin/ enamel-bonded ceramic coverage. A 5-year follow-up. Eur J Oral Sci. 2001; 109(4):222-9.
  28. Nanoleakage types and potential implications: evidence from unfilled and filled adhesives with the same resin composition. Am J Dent. 2004; 17(3):182-90.
  29. Microtensile bond strength of a filled vs unfilled adhesive to dentin using self-etch and total-etch technique. J Dent. 2006; 34(4): 283-91.
  30. Effect of fluoride iontophoresis on the microtensile bond strength between dentin and two adhesive systems. J Dent. 2008; 36(9):697-702.
  31. Effects of multiple adhesive coatings on dentin bonding. Oper Dent. 2004; 29(4):416-23.
  32. Microtensile bond strength of current dentin adhesives measured immediately and 24 hours after application. J Adhes Dent. 2005; 7(4):297-302.
  33. A statistical evaluation of microtensile bond strength methodology for dental adhesives. Dent Mater. 2007; 23(3):385-91.
  34. Bonding of dualcuring resin cements to dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2006; 8(5):299-304.
  35. Microtensile dentin and enamel bond strengths of recent selfetching resins. Oper Dent. 2008; 33(1):89-95.
  36. Compatibility between self-etching adhesive and self-curing resin by addition of anion exchange resin. Dent Mater. 2005; 21(11):1044-50.
  37. The role of oxygen inhibition of a self-etch adhesive on self-cure resin composite bonding. Am J Dent. 2007; 20(3):157-60.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.