The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 10 , ISSUE 6 ( November, 2009 ) > List of Articles


Effect of the Quality of Removable Prostheses on Patient Satisfaction

Riyadh F. Akeel

Citation Information : Akeel RF. Effect of the Quality of Removable Prostheses on Patient Satisfaction. J Contemp Dent Pract 2009; 10 (6):57-64.

DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-10-6-57

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 01-06-2015

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2009; The Author(s).



The objective of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction with removable prostheses and its relationship with denture quality.

Methods and Materials

Sixty-seven patients who received 119 new removable prostheses over a period of one year at the College of Dentistry, King Saud University, were recalled for an interview with regard to their satisfaction with their dentures and a clinical examination. Prosthetic quality was determined using the California Dental Association criteria.


Results showed 75% and 66% of upper and lower dentures, respectively, were reported by patients as satisfactory. Of all the upper prostheses rated as being of acceptable quality, 94% were also reported by patients as satisfactory, but of those of unacceptable quality, only 52% were reported by patients as unsatisfactory. The corresponding figures for lower dentures were 91% and 71%, respectively. No significant associations were found between patient satisfaction and age, or denture experience.


Although acceptable quality of removable prostheses usually resulted in patient satisfaction, the finding that some patients were satisfied with their prostheses despite unacceptable quality suggests other factors besides quality affect outcomes.

Clinical Significance

Patient satisfaction with removable dentures cannot be fully predicted from only the quality standards of those dentures.


Akeel RF. Effect of the Quality of Removable Prostheses on Patient Satisfaction. J Contemp Dent Pract [Internet]. 2009 Nov; 10(6):057-064. Available from: http://www.thejcdp. com/journal/view/volume10-issue6-akeel.

PDF Share
  1. Partial edentulism, prosthetic treatment and oral function in a Dutch population. J Oral Rehabil. 1987; 14(6):549-55.
  2. Signs and symptoms of mandibular dysfunction in shortened dental arches. J Oral Rehabil. 1988; 15(5):413-20.
  3. Economic perspectives on diagnosis and treatment planning in periodontology. J Clin Periodontol. 1986; 13(10):889-93.
  4. Trends and prognoses of dental status in the Swedish population: analysis based on interviews in 1975 to 1997 by Statistics Sweden. Acta Odontol Scand. 2000; 58(4):177-82.
  5. Total tooth loss in the United Kingdom in 1998 and implications for the future. Br Dent J. 2000; 189(11):598-603.
  6. S.). Epidemiology and Oral Disease Prevention Program. Oral health of United States adults. The national survey of oral health in U.S. employed adults and seniors, 1985–1986:regional findings. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 1988.
  7. Age-related satisfaction with complete dentures, desire for improvement and attitudes to implant treatment. Gerodontology. 1994; 11(1):7-12.
  8. The economics of complete dentures and implant-related services: a framework for analysis and preliminary outcomes. J Prosthet Dent. 1998; 79(1):24-30.
  9. Standard of care for the edentulous mandible: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2006; 95(1):71-8.
  10. Dental health status and dental satisfaction. Int J Epidemiol. 1977; 6(1):73-9.
  11. Treatment outcomes with mandibular removable partial dentures: a populationbased study of patient satisfaction. J Prosthet Dent. 1998; 80(1):36-45.
  12. Patient factors in appreciation of complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1967; 17(4):322-8.
  13. A survey of treatment outcomes with removable partial dentures. J Oral Rehabil. 2003; 30(8):847-54.
  14. Factors related to patients’ general satisfaction with removable partial dentures: a stepwise multiple regression analysis. Int J Prosthodont. 2008; 21(1):86-8.
  15. Patients’ complaints and satisfaction 5 years after complete denture treatment. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1990; 18(1):27-31.
  16. An evaluation of the factors pertinent to the success of a complete denture service. J Prosthet Dent. 1964; 14:866-78.
  17. Association between the accuracy of intermaxillary relations and complete denture usage. J Prosthet Dent. 1999; 81(5):520-5.
  18. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1988; 16(6):364-7.
  19. Review of 54 complete denture wearers. Patients’ opinions 1 year after treatment. Acta Odontol Scand. 1972; 30(4):399-414.
  20. to patient satisfaction with complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1976; 35(5): 492-503.
  21. The influence of some anamnestic, demographic, and clinical variables on patient acceptance of new complete dentures. Acta Odontol Scand. 1984; 42(2):119-27.
  22. Factors associated with successful denture therapy. J Prosthodont. 1996; 5(2):84-90.
  23. Evaluation of psychologic factors in geriatric dental patients. J Prosthet Dent. 1962; 12:516-23.
  24. Clinical morbidity and sequelae of treatment with complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1998; 79(1):17-23.
  25. The influence of clinical variables on patients’ satisfaction with complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1990; 63(3):307-10.
  26. Determinants of dissatisfaction with dentures: a multiple regression analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 1990; 64(5):569-72.
  27. Accuracy of perceived treatment needs among geriatric denture wearers. Gerodontology. 1983; 2:67-70.
  28. Expectations and satisfaction of denture patients in a university clinic. J Prosthet Dent. 1986; 55(1):59-63.
  29. Patient perceptions of dental-facial esthetics: shared concerns in orthodontics and prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent. 1984; 52(1):9-13.
  30. Geriatric dentistry: the problem. J Prosthet Dent. 1978; 40(3):324-5.
  31. Age and denture experience as determinants in patient denture satisfaction. J Prosthet Dent. 1988; 59(3):327-9.
  32. The Cornell Medical Index as a prognostic aid for complete denture patients. J Prosthet Dent. 1969; 22(1):20-9.
  33. Clinical criteria. Int Dent J. 1980; 30(4):347-58.
  34. Opinions and wearing habits among patients new to removable partial dentures. An interview study. Swed Dent J. 1989; 13(3):89-93.
  35. Does the quality of advanced prosthetic dentistry determine patient satisfaction? Acta Odontol Scand. 1997; 55(6):365-71.
  36. Variation, treatment outcomes, and practice guidelines in dental practice. J Dent Educ. 1995; 59(1):61-95.
  37. Quality of life—an outcome of oral health care? J Public Health Dent. 1996; 56(2):67-8.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.